Writing Feedback / Pre-nuptial agreements. Do you think everyone should have it? [4]

Nowadays before getting married a couple will consider their marriage contract painstakingly, bearing in mind all the plausible outcomes of their matrimony. However, the opinions have differed and some still believe that it is love that counts while wedding.

In the estimation of most people, pre-nuptial agreement should be obliged to prevent the disadvantageous consequences that might take place after divorce. Nevertheless, the supporters of old views become known by strongly refusing covenants of marriage. To their mind, such contracts are not the accurate omens of the successful marriage.

The pros I see in the matrimonial alliance with pre-nups are that after a family split up, acquired property is divided equally between the two sides. However, at the same time, it seems that marriage contracts cause distrust which is the fatal factor for prosperous domesticity.

According to the law of Ukraine marriage relationship, rights and duties can also be regulated by pre-nuptial agreements. This legislation has been created quite recently and it has not taken on among Ukrainian populace.

In my view, people should be free to choose what they thinks is better for them and that is why I am opposed to forcing everyone to sign a marriage contract which is, in fact, a meaning nothing piece of paper.

Despite all the controversies around the topical issue, I believe that pre-nuptial agreement will finally become binding. People have always rejected innovations, but then admitted that they had done rightly accepting them, which is, I think, going to happen one more time.

Writing Feedback / City or village - what is better? [3]

Nowadays the most active migrations come about inland. Basically, the resettlement is propelled by economic factors. Cities welcome commuters at their workplaces, and the picture is balanced with campers and cottagers forsaking the vanities of the urbs. Seeing no opportunities in the countryside, many villagers hive off to boroughs while well-off or retired townsfolk move to suburban houses.

In my view, it is not only personal preferences, but people's age and first concerns that determine their choice of habitation. For instance, parents preoccupied with their offspring's physical wellness would rather their children enjoy the environmentally friendly and less criminogenic outlands. Rustic peace and tranquility is another undisputed advantage for the senior citizens who choose to settle down in a rural homestead every here and there.

However, if you are an achiever who has always dreamed of the rush of city life, metropolis will suit you perfectly. Ambitions could be the main reason why young adults tend to take up the capital to accomplish their aims.

Hideous air pollution, traffic jams and overcrowding are obvious drawbacks of all urban centers. Car emissions and industrial exhaust affect town dwellers' health. According to recent research, the majority of Ukrainians have had some thyroid problems due to aerial contamination, the investigators assume.

In conclusion, both extensive urban areas and back-country have their pros and cons. While selecting a residence, one should bear in mind his or her personal prospects and priorities

Grammar, Usage / I wish I didn't say that. I wish I hadn't said that. [5]

Is the second variant possible?
If so, what is the difference between them?

Grammar, Usage / poorer or more poor [8]

I've met both case, but I don't think they're both correct.
Please tell me which one is right.