Writing Feedback /
The chart informs the number of Bulgarians moving to different countries based on level of education [5]
Thank for correcting my writing winda. However, I would like to clarify what you ask above.
The bar chart informs regarding the number of Bulgarian inhabitants wanting move to foreign countries based on three graduated categories: higher, secondary and primary education,
measured -->
This sentence is passive, " is measured' and where is the information about lower education?this is not passive sentence but it is reducing adjective clause which refer to "the number of Bulgarian inhabitants". in percentage between 2002 and 2008.
Overall, it can be clearly seen that the number of people with secondary education who want to live in another country was the highest
amongst -->
why do you use amongst? is that preposition like "among" or not?amongst and among are the same; preposition in sentence. Both are true if we use one of them in sentence. However, "amongst" tend to old-fashioned for some people whereas "among" is more common in British style. level of education whereas the figure for primary and lower education experienced upward trend. On the other hand, the percentage of people having higher education
had -->
it is better to use "saw, experienced, or witnessed" as a academic style"had" is formal verb like saw, experienced and witnessed. It also can be used in academic style. you can read my essay repeatedly. I use all of three verb which you mean. this is just choice to variety of "verb" only. a gradual increase in the fourth first year of period before it dropped dramatically at the end of period.
In 2002, the figure for people with secondary education stood at
75% look at clearly information, I see, it was 65%,
yes, this is my flaw, I am so sorry which was 48% and 47% higher than for the number of higher and primary education respectively
what do you mean?I mean that this is Adjective Clause which refer to 65% of secondary education, better for you to read your book (IELTS buddy) to get more explanationI give you some edits, "where coming second and third were primary and lower education at 18% and primary school at 17%".Here, you use wrong connector "where" (it is for explaining "place") Then, even though the number of secondary education was still the highest, it saw a slight decrease in the following year, at 61% in 2006 to finish in 2008, at 59%.
you should put particular attention with complex sentence , I see it was vague. Y
es, you may be true, but it is form of complex sentence. Check your grammar book again.Moving to a more detailed analysis
in my opinion, this sentences is suitable with advanced writing, I advise you for using simple word first.yes, you are true Mrs but I regret to say you if this is my lesson in beginner IELTS class and my teacher advice to use the sentence from the bar chart reveals that at 18% the percentage of primary and lower education had a similar pattern with the higher education over the
next followingdo you know exactly what is difference between over the next four year? and over the next following four year? perhaps you can look for explaining it. four year. In addition, The chart also shows that the figure for primary education remained stable relatively at 19% in 2006 before it witnessed a dramatic rise in 2008, at 32%. In contrast, after the number of higher education rose slowly by 3% from 2002 to 2006, it fell over twofold in 2008, at 9%.
Generally, I am really happy with your suggestion and correction but you also have to improve your grammar. Let us to learn together.