I agree with the Kevins. I like your way with words.
Just somethings I saw as confusing here and there:
I've been dismissed as a "brain" for most of my academic life, approached for homework answers and used as a human assignment planner.
modifier issue? the second clause doesnt connect like it should.
also, you switch between I and she and one and you. I like it sometimes, but other times, I get confused who is who, and what is what.
something you grow accustomed to
the you< informal
I was the five foot-one inch thespian who played the baritone saxophone, a vast instrument rivaling her minuscule height. her minuscule height, who is her? you?
[quote=element_g]That is arguably a true statement, since most immigrant Indians come to the U.S. to pursue the science profession, a field that guarantees financial stability.
That is an arguable* statement, since...
The Indians occupying other fields of profession are probably still in India; this small, science-oriented group usually has the means to immigrate to America, lending to this delusion that everyone from India has a technical degree of some sort.
first part is what I guess people could say stuck up...; plus, I don't think the two clauses connect. what do you mean by small, science-oriented group? the doctors/engineers? again, that clause at the very end, lending to this... doesn't connect somewhat. it hangs there.
Those who make such assumptions wouldn't comprehend that the utter poverty and lack of adequate health professionals in India is the real reason the girl wants to be a physician.
what are the assumptions? it's not right after the previous ones, so the flow is somewhat interrupted. again, the girl...I guess you're going for a third person story effect, but it's a bit far from the place you start talking in third person, so it seems disconnected a tad. then in the following sentence, you go back to first.
But intolerant thinking restricts such revelations, instead feeding society's blatant typecasting.
and instead feeds*
expectations from a traditional Indian family,
this somewhat diminishes your claim about stereotypes. by mentioning tradition all of a sudden, you show that it is somewhat feeding into those stereotypes. so unless you say that yes there arguable facts about being Indian, but that you no there you shy away from them for such-and-such reasons, leave it out? would sound better and get a stronger point across
2.5 family
what's this mean? 2 and a half people?
It's undeniable that the "stereotype" which has tagged along for most of my life makes up a significant portion of who I am, as much as the fifteen odd countries I've visited have opened my mind to all walks of life and culture.
ah. I see now. however, that as much as...I'm not sure the comma works here first part is present simple, second part has a "have" helping verb, fix it up a bit?
Without facing this judgment we make so voluntarily of one another
again, the we to one incongruency
one sole purpose: to reach their aspirations
maybe you can use a dash
Maybe there is still hope for that overachieving Indian girl,
Ok..why the still hope? you didnt mention losing hope or anything that seemed hopeless. maybe hope to sth?
I really liked the essay, thought it was quite long. You use a lot of complex sentence structure, sometimes overly so. If you could make a question about your essay, what do you think it would be? just wondering.