The wonder of silence is broken when I speak.
The emotions I experience are a clinging to my dynamic speaking each day.
What? I didn't get you mean here, it's too ambiguous to try and correct. The sentence
needs better flow too.
With a burning insertion of vehemence I said,
Mostly everybodypeople in the room was heartless for a moment.
What? They didn't have a heart? Do they bear a cold attitude toward what you said? It's very unclear
The atmosphere hadn't settled, but then the student government members all agreed. From that point forwardthen , [b]the insignificant became significant because we began to help the students and listen to themlisten and help the students[/ b]. I was now perceived as someone who took a definitive stance as a leader.
Give example to how you "help students and listen to them"
I agree with you that student councils or any club's leaders never really do much; however, I don't think you should call their unproductive leadership "lies" (it's such a strong word).
Your sentences seem to be a little bit clutter and wordy; however, I suggest that you refine the content of your essay before worrying about technical errors.
Reading through your essay, I'm sorry, but it is not fun. I read your essay twice and barely have an idea of what you're talking about.
The first para. is so long-winded and doesn't really have to state your points or thesis.
The silence of wonder is broken when I speak.
That sentence seem to be the thesis for your essay. However, it's so ambiguous and hard to comprehend the point you're trying to make
Just when I thought your essay was going to be able "speaking," your 2nd para. steered me into thinking that you're trying to talk about "leadership" instead. Try to reinforce your focus on "speaking" better in the 2nd para.
Overall, your essay uses too many abstract wordings, try to incorporate something more solid into your paper.
Good luck :)
Have time? Look at mine! Thanks