These mistakes should be cleaned up:
concession to fetch the defendant's past record has been AROUND
last for a long time. Some people who are against for it argue
reason is that I
do think it HELPS is helpful for the court to judge correctly
or BE BETTER INFORMED TO JUDGE
and by checkING
one's past criminal records, undoubtedly
Secondly, as for the reason that it influences the judger's judgement proposed by the opponents, it is a conclusion worth of rethinking. Owing to a judgement result is made by the jury ultimately, soit is the jury's responsibility to make an objective judgement, WITHOUT THE BIAS OF PAST RECORDS
but not the past record's responsibility . In other words, a jury should analyZe a defendant's past material objectively. If he could not, then, it is him or other things should be responsible for the case.
OTHER THAN THE PART I HIGHLIGHTED IN RED, THE REST OF THE PARAGRAPH IS CONFUSING
the individual's any information.
"ANY" IS NOT AN APPROPRIATE WORD -WHAT DO YOU MEAN?