There is a statement that suggests increasing the fuel price is the best way to solve the world's environmental problem. I totally disagree with this notion because there are far better alternative methods to tackle environmental problems.
Why I believe increasing the price of fuel is not only the best way to address the environmental problem. We live in a world where everything is automated and operated by machines, one major problem is that most of them use fuel, especially fossil fuel, as a source of generating energy to power its funtion. When fossil fuels are burned releases harmful chemicals into the atmosphere and potentially harm the environment. Therefore, the demand for fuel is always at the top, and increasing its price, so people and companies will have no other way to work or manufacture without it. What is more, this not only did not solve the problem effectively, but also created financial pressure on society.
There are more optimal solutions than increasing the price of fuel. One of the solutions, on an individual's level, is raising society's awareness of our critical environmental problem. When people understand their responsibility for the environment and how badly it can affect everyone, they will likely take action. Also, the good idea of protecting the environment spreads like wildfire. When we see another person pick a can to throw into the litter or when we see someone clearing the river of plastic overflow, we will mostly try to copy those actions. Another solution is for the government to take actions to offer tax-free or reduced tax policies on environmentally friendly products, especially biofuels. We cannot erase the need for fossil fuel - the most popular fuel in the world, but we can simply replace it with a better alternation, a environmental friendlier one, biofuel. Reducing the tax on this fuel, it encourages companies that manufacture the product to have a more attractive price for consumers. This allocates a portion of regular fossil fuel to biofuel, aiding the environment by reducing a sizable factor that pollutes it.
For those reasons, I conclude that increasing the price of fuel is not the best choice; in the worst case, this solution can put financial risk to society. If anything, we should reduce the price of biofuel only, alongside policies that reduce or give free-of-charge tax for biofuel and other environmentally friendly products. Additionally, raising awareness among people should also be considered, as it helps the idea of protecting the environment and encourages people to take action.
Thank you for reviewing my essay, anyway, I need some advices to write better ideas and improve my coherence and cohesion.
Why I believe increasing the price of fuel is not only the best way to address the environmental problem. We live in a world where everything is automated and operated by machines, one major problem is that most of them use fuel, especially fossil fuel, as a source of generating energy to power its funtion. When fossil fuels are burned releases harmful chemicals into the atmosphere and potentially harm the environment. Therefore, the demand for fuel is always at the top, and increasing its price, so people and companies will have no other way to work or manufacture without it. What is more, this not only did not solve the problem effectively, but also created financial pressure on society.
There are more optimal solutions than increasing the price of fuel. One of the solutions, on an individual's level, is raising society's awareness of our critical environmental problem. When people understand their responsibility for the environment and how badly it can affect everyone, they will likely take action. Also, the good idea of protecting the environment spreads like wildfire. When we see another person pick a can to throw into the litter or when we see someone clearing the river of plastic overflow, we will mostly try to copy those actions. Another solution is for the government to take actions to offer tax-free or reduced tax policies on environmentally friendly products, especially biofuels. We cannot erase the need for fossil fuel - the most popular fuel in the world, but we can simply replace it with a better alternation, a environmental friendlier one, biofuel. Reducing the tax on this fuel, it encourages companies that manufacture the product to have a more attractive price for consumers. This allocates a portion of regular fossil fuel to biofuel, aiding the environment by reducing a sizable factor that pollutes it.
For those reasons, I conclude that increasing the price of fuel is not the best choice; in the worst case, this solution can put financial risk to society. If anything, we should reduce the price of biofuel only, alongside policies that reduce or give free-of-charge tax for biofuel and other environmentally friendly products. Additionally, raising awareness among people should also be considered, as it helps the idea of protecting the environment and encourages people to take action.
Thank you for reviewing my essay, anyway, I need some advices to write better ideas and improve my coherence and cohesion.
