Some people think that children of different abilities should be educated together. Other people think that it's better to teach the intelligent children separately and with special treatment. What do you think? Use your own ideas of knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.
It has been a controversial issue over whether general education or specific education is seemed more suitable for children. Even though some people argue that the former alternative could be benefit children for their future development, I firmly believe that the latter opinion is better for them.
To begin with, dividing children into different classes due to their abilities advantages teachers to formulate better target-oriented contents of courses. On the one hand, a diverse range of knowledge expanded from fundamental courses can be instilled into wise children in order to maximize their talent. On the other hand, teachers can put more attention on the comprehension of basic concept in terms of the other children to guarantee the minimum of syllabus.
Secondly, it is an undeniable fact that both the sense of conceit from clever children and the sense of self-abasement from others exist in the indistinctive education. However, they are not only eliminated. Even better. Because the similar intelligent level children are aggregated, the advanced children turn self-conceited feeling into competitive spirit, and self-abased children commence to help each other.
Last but not least, my opinion can easily find common view, even 2500 years ago. Confucius has said:' teach students in accordance with their aptitude.' The educational philosophy is adopted by offspring and verified as validity.
Given this argument, it is reasonable to conclude that children should be educated according to their natural abilities.
I firmly believe that the latter opinion is better for them. - alternative or option
On the one hand, a diverse range of knowledge expanded from fundamental courses can be instilled into wise children in order to maximize their talent. On the other hand, teachers can put more attention on the comprehension of basic concept in terms of the other children to guarantee the minimum of syllabus.
There is no need to repeat the word combination "on the other hand". Moreover, if I understand correctly, these two sentences support your topic statement rather that refute, which makes the use of the mentioned phrase inappropriate. Insteas, you may use other transition words, such as in addition or furthermore
Confucius has said:' teach students in accordance with their aptitude.' The educational philosophy is adopted by offspring and verified as validity.
This quote should not be introduced at the end. It would better serve as a topic statement for your first paragraph.
Add more examples to assure the readers that your opinion is well supported.
[b]Given this argument, - which argument? If you mean the one about Confucius, then you do not take into account all the reasons that you stated above in paragraphes - it is reasonable to conclude that children should be educated according to their natural abilities. - conclusion is very short. list your reasons once more and repeat your viewpoint.
The last paragraph:
Given the above argument, it is reasonable to conclude that if children are educated according to their natural abilities, their talent can be developed to the fullest and children will be benefit from it in their future development.
The last paragraph:
Given the above arguments, it is reasonable to conclude that if children are educated according to their natural abilities, their talent can be developed to the fullest and children will be benefit from it in their future development .
It The question of whether general education or specialized education seems more suitible for gifted children has been a controversial issue. over whether general education or specific education is seemed more suitable for children. Even though some people argue that the former alternative general education could be benefit children for their future development, I firmly believe that the latter opinion a specialized education is better for them.
To begin with, dividing children into different classes due to their abilities advantages enales teachers to formulate better
However, they are not only eliminated. Even better. Because Specialized education eliminated this problem, because when we group together children of similar intelligence levels, the advanced children turn self-conceited feelings into the competitive spirit, and self-abased children commence the process of helping each other.
This is a good argument! I suggest that you should adhere to simplicity as you write, because simple is always powerful. Keep sentences short when you can. :-)
Thank you Kevin.
However, In my mind, the more complicated your sentences are, the high mark you will gain. Because my english teachers told me that there were too many simple sentences in your essay several month ago. At the same time, I also well understand the mean of your word "simple is always powerful".
So, I feel a little confuse about how to write an essay and improve my writing.
I believe that children of different abilities should not be educated together
Hello Qin Zhang
I am not sure about your word "indistinctive "
When brighter and weaker students are educated together, less able students may lose confidence or self-esteem while more academically talented pupils may become conceited. Separate classes allow brighter students to compete with each other and weaker students to work together.
Your Confucius quote is very appropriate, even if not everyone will agree with it.
Enda
Hi,stranger4ever
You can list your reasons or advantages about studying together. We can discuss it.
