the inequality between rich and poor nations is wider than it has been before.
what do you think are the main causes of this difference and what do you think can be done to reduce the gap?
answer:
In this day and age, the developed countries are experiencing the greater development than less developed countries. As such, the significant difference is inevitable between them and it will lead to be a threat for global community. This essay will discuss that politic monopoly is the key reason why this worrying trend happened, and autonomy and multilateral cooperation are the solutions for decreasing the impacts of this problem.
The predominant factor why inequality is occurred among countries nowadays is monopoly tactic from welfare states. They intervene government's policies of conflict nations when they need some helps for stabilizing region. For instance, a September 2015 BBC News reveals that 70% super power nations always intervene some rules of unstable states aimed grasping their raw material resources. As a result, poor country was loosed their wealth. Not only thanks to intervention, but also vote right. Even though most of United Nations members agreed about particular decisions, that result will be canceled by using veto right. Therefore, the wealth nations can improve their wealthy from poor nations.
Apart from this, there are some ways to tackle this worrying condition or at least reduce the effects. Initially, poor states need a independence from the intervention of other nations. They can organize their folks and original material resources independently. Eventually, modern countries should help the traditional nations in many aspects such as finance, educations and health because limited technology, information and medicine are the factor of poverty which impede country's development.
To conclude, politic monopoly from strong country affected the dissimilarity level to weak states. Go hand in hand between both nations levels and right of independent government systems are the solution for reducing this gap from deteriorating further.
Irham, while you make a compelling argument showing that foreign government intervention is the reason that there is a large gap between the finances of the developed and under developed countries, your line of reasoning does not consider one of the reasons that the developed countries need to intervene politically in the affairs of a poor nation. That of the infighting / conflict / civil unrest that exists in that nation. In other words, the poor nations often are faced with an internal political situation where, if the richer foreign country were not to intervene, it would result in the demise of a nation. As payment for this help, for saving the nation from the conflicts their own people created such as genocide, the more powerful nation asks for payment, that comes in the form of sequestering certain natural resources of the poor country. Keeping this in mind, what then, is the reason that the financial disparity between the nations exist? Is it really the intervention of foreign nations in the problems of state of a weak government, or the lack of / inability of the nation to use its resources properly in order to protect itself from internal conflict? Do you see where there is a loophole in your reasoning at this point? Would you really consider this a welfare tactic?
As such, the significant difference is inevitable between them and it will lead to be a threat for global community.
- Your discussion is not clear at this point. What is the threat for the global community that will arise from this difference? Can you be more specific for the sake of your essay discussion?
Initially, poor states need a independence from the intervention of other nations.
- How can this be done when the poor state actually requires the intervention of a stronger state in order to keep their government in place and stop their people from involving themselves in a civil war?
Eventually, modern countries should help the traditional nations in many aspects such as finance, educations and health because limited technology, information and medicine are the factor of poverty which impede country's development.
- The developed countries already help the poor nations do this. Yet you say by doing this, the rich country is taking advantage of the poorer nation. These bilateral, commercial, and political agreements are necessary for the development of a nation. It allows the rich nation access to certain things owned by the poor nation in exchange for help. Yet your essay considers such things a part of stealing from a poor nation. I think you need to rethink your position on the matter in order to remove this conflict.
