hello! a fine attempt no doubt, but here are some suggestions. First of all I could not understand the idea about second opinion. it is because the example you gave is such a rare situation. there are a lot of reasons: people kill each other for money, love, even out of jealousy. but killing for mercy is done only once in a blue moon.
why would you judge a crime logically when you can do it rationally?
try to avoid such expressions: make it a statement rather.
t humans are gifted
human is gifted withmore safe and secure.
safer and secure
f crimes were viewed in a flat perspective, potential crimes would be reduced since individuals will be aware that the chances of being acquitted will be low.
try to rephrase because different parts are not supporting each other according to the tense: you use three tenses in one sentence( were, would be, will be)
t is more human to carefully review
it is better to review