[ielts task 2] Giving lectures in auditoriums to large numbers of students is an old way of teaching

Please give me some feedbacks. Thank a lot!

traditional teaching is stilll important

Giving lectures in auditoriums to large numbers of students is an old way of teaching. With the technology available today there is no justification for it, and everything should be done online. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your own opinion.

Some people think that lecturing in a large auditorium to students is an old fashion way of teaching and instead we should replace it with online teaching. This essay disagree with this statement and believes traditional teaching still has its own place. The essay will discuss the advantages of traditional teaching which are helping students get answers directly from teachers and increasing their attention.

Unlike online teaching, face-to-face study gives the student a chance to get answers directly from the teachers. Normally in an online class, the teachers can not pay enough attention to every single student as they are in a traditional class. Consequently, students may struggle with knowledge and have many unanswered questions in their heads, causing gaps in their knowledge. For example, VTV, the national broadcast tv of Viet Nam, 83 out of 100 students said they have problems with asking teachers to reply to their questions in the online class and this consequently degrades their marks.

Another advantage of face-to-face teaching is the increase in the attention of students. Because they are gathered in a closed room and are regulated and pressured by the teacher, students have to be more concentrated. Furthermore, being focused helps students study more effective and achieve higher educational results. For instance, a recent study by NEU reported that students who study face-to-face focus 30% more than those who study online.

In conclusion, traditional teaching still plays an important role. Particularly in the ability of answer face-to-face to the students and increase their attention.

With only 252 words in this essay, it meets the word minimum requirement but not the full scoring considerations for various sections. There needs to be at least 275-300 words put down to achieve that. The only plus point of this word count is that it will not meet deductions for under word writing.

Since the writer is being asked to discuss the measure of his personal opinion, the essay should not be devoid of first person pronoun usage. Rather, it should be heavily present. The essay will not write itself so never say


. You are the writer. Own it.

Now, for the actual reason this essay will receive a failing mark. The prompt deviation that the writer created. Did he misunderstand the writing instruction


? Which is why he incorrectly responded with


The incorrect response statement will result in an irrelevant response score (failing).

I cannot proceed with reviewing the essay at this point. There is no sense in reviewing a failing essay from the start.