In some countries, an increasing number of people are suffering form health problems as a result off eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
government policy toward health care
An opinion is put forward whether raising tax for fast food should be implemented in order to minimize potential health risks related to this kind of food. This essay firmly agrees with the government's policy on levying a tariff on junk food as it not only brings better health for fast food consumers but also improves domestic health care system and public's awareness about fast food.
To begin with, consumers' health will be better when they eat less fast food. As buyers might reconsider buying fast food at a higher price, there is likely to be a decline in junk food consumption. The number of people suffering from diseases associated with fast food will gradually decrease. To clarify, people will have little possibility of suffering from such health concerns like diabetes, obesity and cancer as they no longer pose a threat to fast food consumers' health.
It is also believed that authorities' decision on imposing higher tax enhances the country's health care policy and people's perception about junk food. The money gained from taxes go straight to the government's budget. That revenue will be spent to establish medical programs, voluntary charities to support victims having health concerns regarding to ready-to-use food. Campaigns against the use of convenience food could be an effective way to raise people understanding on how it can adversely affect our health.
All things considered, the governmental bodies should work towards this policy due to its effectivess in reducing health concerns, strengthening health care structure and raising public awareness in terms of fast food.(243 words)