Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
scientific information - available or not?
We are living in the era of technology which changes so quickly every day. This is because most of updated achievements are shared to public in many manners such as scientific research, business and the academic world. However, some argue that information should be limited to access. I personally believe that people need to approach latest data as much as possible.
On the one hand, sharing information anticipates society developments. In term of science, results uncovered from some findings could be solutions for other fields. Consequently, this helps save not only money and time but also labor force. Additionally, established academic lessons assist students have opportunities to catch up contemporary data, which is beneficial for those who are preparing for their thesis. For example, block chain technology is applied thoroughly in various kinds of industry. By scanning bar code, customers are able to verify all information about the food that they consume, including the origin, quality, dosage of vitamin contained on it. Therefore, I consider that information is necessary to be shown publicly.
On the other hand, there are many sensitive data which must be hidden away from society. Those could be criminal records, personal status or bank account number. For instances, personal phone numbers sometime are collected when we surf the Internet and unfortunately, we are disturbed by advertisements sent to our phone every day, this currently becomes such a big issue. Hence, some people believe that limiting information might be the best remedy for this problem.
In conclusion, even few negative points about publishing data to every body, I still highly encourage to share knowledge to society as long as we are able to well-control sensitive details.
(280 words)Holt Educational Consultant - / 14,835 
4783 The instruction for this essay is "discuss both views and present your opinion". The writer is required to present an analytical opinion for each of the topic paragraphs. What is an analytical opinion? This is an opinion that considers the public supporting reasons for the opinion, based on his agreement or disagreement with the given subject. The writer must use a personal debate format that is similar to:
The public opinion that supports this opinion is mostly based on the freedom of people to be informed of any development with regards to science... An opinion that is based on the Freedom of Information Act. While there is a law that provides for open sharing of information, I disagree with this practice because....
Now, there are also people who disagree and say that these information are too valuable to be shared. They believe these must be protected because of a country's scientific, economic, and business interests. This is an opinion I agree with because...
Debate both sides of the issue as presented in the prompt. Why would some people support it? Why do you think it should be supported? Why would others not support it? Do you think it should not be supported? Why? These are the most basic questions that your response to this prompt should respond to. These are the standard guide questions you can use to draft your response. This is the only essay where you can agree or disagree in the 2 paragraphs. That is how you create the coherence and cohesiveness in the discussion, which is heavily considered in this type of discussion. Always expand on the personal opinion even if you have only 1 sentence to represent the public opinion. It is your insight into the discussion that is important. For the thesis statement, you should merely imply your opinion of both topics as you will be discussing both in the next paragraphs.
