Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others. Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped together and taught separately.
Do you agree or disagree?
One can safely assume that in every learning environment there is at least one student who is boisterous and has behavioural problems. Some people are of the opinion that they can have a negative impact on their colleagues and grouping all of them together is an effective way to create a conducive learning environment. However, apropos of the statement, I am in consummate discord with it. The bases for my opinion are psychological and academical.
[...]
Hi, here are my suggestions.
Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others. Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped together and taught separately.
Do you agree or disagree?
One can safely assume that in every learning environment there is at least one student who is boisterous and has behavioural problems. Some people are of the opinion that they [these students] {before it sounded like "they" referred to "some people"} can have a negative impact on their colleagues [classmates] {teachers have colleagues, but the word sounds odd when referring to students} and grouping all of them together is an effective way to create a conducive learning environment. However, apropos of the statement, I am in consummate discord {this vocabulary sounds pretty odd here} with it. The bases for my opinion are psychological and academical. {it would be "academic", but that has another definition as unimportant or irrelevant, so I would probably rephrase the sentence}
From a psychological viewpoint, it is widely spread {"spread" sounds odd here - I guess you mean the belief is widespread} that students who do not receive sufficient attention at home are more prone to bad behavioural problem[s ] {"bad" seemed redundant here} than those who do. As a result, they will use all means possible, namely behaving badly[,] to obtain the much needed attention from their teachers. Thus, grouping students with disruptive tendencies together is not the most appropriate solution as it will only make them feel more ostracized.
From an academical point of view, putting disobedient students in one class will only limit their educational opportunities and further discourage the students. It will be hard for the teachers to educate the students when they are all the disobedient and by the end of the day, nothing will get done.
It appears that combining the students, regardless of whether or not they're{avoid using contractions} rebellious, will serve as a more effective solution. On the one hand, [the] teacher will have an easier time controlling the student[s ] and figuring out what measures to take with each student. On the other hand, having a well-behav[ed] and intelligent student {this sounds like there will be one good student and all the rest disobedient} in the class will serve as a role model for the disobedient students. Consequently, disobedient students will somehow {"somehow" sounds a bit odd here - it means you don't really know why} feel compelled to emulate the role model and change for the better.
