learning about the past has been a colossal issue over the past decades.
There is no collosal issue being presented. Merely a difference of belieffs. You are trying to use a phrase I taught you. That is good. The bad, is that you used it improperly. / There is no "bug" reference in the prompt. Thus, indicating that you misunderstood the topic being presented.
Tip: Do not just use newly learned phrases for the sake of using it. It must be referred to in the proper context otherwise, it doesn't help your score.
In this essay, I will discuss both views and explain the importance of history.
This is a repeat of the instructions, not a thesis reference. What is your opinion ? Do not explain the importance of history. Rather, support one of the 2 given reasons with a personal reason. Rather, explain how history establishes an understanding of the present or, why history is an irrelevant refence to present times. Nobody asked you to explain why history is important. Do not change the prompt requirements . An unrelated discussion will automatically get you a failing score.
You portray your explanation solely from your personal view. The 3 discussion points must refer to explanations of the previous 2 groups before your own. You also only explain the importance of history. You do not make reference to the major discussion points provided The essay can and will fail since you did not follow the discussion requirements. Your discussion format is improper and doesn't follow the required format.
Without a doubt,
There is a doubt based on the given presentation. You are really failing bigtime with this essay. There are 2 beliefs because of the doubts about the importance of history.
You clearly have English comprehension skill issues that can only be addressed by more comprehension exercises prior to more essay response practices.