The following passage will present a couple of my perspectives.
This creates an incoherent paragraph. What was the point of presenting the discussion topic if you will not add the direct response to the questions provided? Those questions are given to help you set the direction for your paper right from the start. It serves as the discussion outline for the reader to follow. That should be the short form of your expanded discussion in the discussion paragraphs. Without it, the writer's opinion is not clearly stated so the paragraph falls short of preliminary scoring considerations.
Both of the reasoning paragraphs fall short of the paragraph sentence requirements leading to more coherent and cohesive discussion points. While the first reason is under discussed, the second reason lacks additional explanation development. So, while you are explaining your beliefs to the reader, you are not completely explaining the foundation of these ideas based on full explanations and examples as required by the writing task.
You clearly understand the prompt. You can discuss relevant ideas in relation to the subject. The problem is in the way you present your ideas. The sentence formation needs work and the vocabulary used could be more appropriate to the task. Not a bad start though. If you clean up your sentence problems, you should get a better score in practice tests later on.