Some people believe that there should be fixed punishment of crime. Others however argue that the circumstances of an individual crime and the motivation for committing it , should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment:
We humans are effigies of imperfection and mistakes. Sometimes these mistakes leads to crime , which have its impact on one individual or on society. There are two ways of living life either by honor or by disgrace. Crime is among those acts which gives disgrace to a person in our culture and society . Judiciary plays a vital role in controlling these offences to make security and system strong enough for public. Laws are the pillar in our constitution for stating level of punishment against every crime. There are fixed punishments but every time while giving judgment certain things are to be consider like circumstances and motivational factor.
Punishment against any crime should be fixed but constitution should allow molding of punishment . A judge cannot give straight away his order without listening and analyzing circumstances under which crime took place and motivational factor behind it. For example to hit someone for his protection and saving of a life of a human being should not be consider as an public disturbing offence. But if the same is done for any loot or molestation should be consider as an offence and guilty should be punished.
Reason behind crime is very essential part of judgment . Without knowing exact details an innocent person might be considered as guilty and would be punished at the same level as a criminal , which is injustice . Punishment level of a crime should be defined as the person who is committing it must be aware of final result or level of punishment , but it 's the duty of judge to analyze reason of commitment of that crime. Circumstances and motivational factor sometimes make human behavior to do against his will and against his normal nature, so they have to be considered for sure.