despite the wide agreement that authority; refers to the government institutions in this essay;
havehas (this refers to "authority") an obvious intent
ofon fostering society's well-being
Your introduction is great, but there is a problem in the organization of it. You started the introduction with a good motivator/general background. After that, u should rewrite the topic (thesis statement) and then give your opinion. In fact, the main idea of the topic is that "Can the questioning authority improve a society in various facets?". U wrote this point at the end of the introduction. In my opinion it would be better to write the different parts of the introduction in the order that I wrote below:
1) Motivator; 2) Thesis statement(What is the main idea of the essay); 3) your opinion; 4) Blueprint
Opponents of this idea argue that questioning the authority might jeopardize sensitive issues like religious harmony, foster rebellion and create chaos and unrest
How will the questioning authority jeopardize such issues that u stated above? U did not support this statement.
Whether it is Dr Martin Luther King; Mahatma Gandhi; or Libyan people, their collective questioning conduced to the great social change.
U tried to support your words by a quotation from Gandhi, but it is not clear. What type of change do you mean? Make it apparent.
Good job
Hope the comments be useful
Ahmad