Do not include a personal opinion statement at the start of the paraphrase. This opinion should not be included because it is not a part of the original topic presentation. It is not related to the original prompt and therefore, should be skipped in the restatement. The Next 2 sentences were all that were needed to restate the topic from the first version.
There is a bit of a confusion with the following writer's statement:
Although I interpret this point of view
What does this mean in the mind of the writer? What exactly was he trying to say in his native tongue? This is a phrase that does not make any logical sense to the examiner. The last part, the one that clearly states the opinion basis, would have made for a better, clearer, and supported writer's opinion statement.
The comparative analysis as required of this writing is lacking. The general statement, without pronoun usage indicates that these are observations made only from the personal opinion of the writer. A POV that is lacking in basis since there should be a discussion regarding:
1. What the public opinion is and why it is supported by the public
2. The writer's view of these reasons and why he opposes or supports these
The writer failed to properly represent his own opinion as well. By explaining it in the concluding paragraph, he automatically failed the test since there no closing summary as required by the formatting considerations. If he wanted to use the 3 paragraph response format then the presentation should have been:
Par. 1: Prompt restatement + opinion w/ thesis
Par. 2: Explanation for public opinion 1 with correct pronoun usage
Par. 3: Explanation for public opinion 2 with correct pronoun usage
Par. 4: Personal opinion using first person pronouns
Par. 5: Concluding summary
His reasoning statements are confusing and difficult to follow due to the lack of cohesive discussion. The topics do not interrelate in the paragraphs and the explanations seem to move from one topic to another without any connecting reasons.
It is for these reasons that the presentation can be considered weak and short on scoring considerations that would have helped it pass the test.