No need for "the" here:
The Bonaria cites
the past experience to...
conclude that if the sport events can be
holed held again in the country, the country's economy will...
You do not need to use BUT with EVEN THOUGH. Choose one or the other: However, even though the argument, at first glance, appears to be somewhat convincing,
but further reflection reveal...
First of all, Bonaria cannot simply build the connection between the major soccer event and the increase in tourism, because those two events may not have direct causal relationship.---great job here.
That is to say, one thing happening before another cannot be
took assumed to be a cause for the later.
For example, John ate a fish in the morning, and then he got sick in the night. Can we just simply make the conclusion that the fish is not fresh? ---I think maybe you do not need to explain an example of the logical fallacy. Then again, I like the interesting example you give and the storytelling, conversational style it achieves...
'The country of Bonaria held a major soccer event five years ago." does not say anything that the major soccer event even in the past produced any increase in tourism.
Yes, you are right! But this is the prompt to which the essay responds. You and the essayist, student7, seem to be saying the same thing. Thanks, both of you, for making this great thread, which will probably benefit many students who see it in the future.