The first sentence is the writer's personal opinion and should be merged with his opinion sentence as the reasoning basis instead. Never place an unrelated discussion point at the start of the essay as the examiner will see this as a deviation and deduct necessary points for the accuracy of the presentation. He will also not appreciate the lack of opinion presentation in the same paragraph. He will definitely not give accuracy and opinion scores in the paragraph that requires its presentation when the writer does not give any opinion in the paragraph. This is an almost failing prompt restatement+writer's opinion presentation. It cannot be given full scoring merits.
Actual scoring problems arise from the lack of proper discussion perspective in the discussion paragraphs. That is because all of the statements provided are solely from the writer's personal opinion / perspective. The discussion that is required needs the writer to offer an insight into a comparative discussion for each public opinion. That means:
POV 1: State the topic + why the public supports it + writer's opinion (support/non support)
POV 2: State the topic + public reasons for support + writer's opinion (support / non support)
The points of view and writer's opinion may be discussed in no particular order. It does not matter to the examiner. What does matter is the clarity of the writer's point of view in comparison to the public reasoning.
On the other hand, advertising does not pay attention.
This statement makes it appear that advertisers do not pay attention to the audience. However, it should mean that the people no longer pay attention to advertisements. The sentence is misleading, unclear, and refers to the wrong audience premise.