I concur with the first way of thinking.
The writer has not formatted his response properly. The topics cannot be discussed selectively as the 2 are partnered presentation topics in the original prompt.
Concurring with a way of thought is also unacceptable because the discussion question relates to a viewpoint related to positive or negative developments for both groups in relation to technology access.
Creating an unrelated discussion response will result in topic response deductions for this essay.
the abatement of mortality rate by accidents and air pollution
The writer is off target in his discussion. The only basis for consideration is the cost of technology as it relates to work and study. The writer shows that he has not understood the discussion requirements. He has failed the test.
Use an outline before writing the draft and final response next time:
Topic: Work and study from home
Subjects : Students and adults
Discussion Focus: Cheap technology has made it easier to work and study from home
Discussion Point: Is it a positive or negative development?