Tran Hai Dung
Jul 8, 2023
Writing Feedback / IELTS TASK 2: Finacial aid becoming the problem [2]
Topic:
Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty.
Therefore, developed countries would give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.
It is widely acknowledged that wealthy countries are using the wrong way to help poorer countries out of poverty, they ought to figure out the right track instead of financial aid. While this thinking is valid to a certain extent, I would contend that finance support also has both benefits and harm
It is conceivable why some subscribe to the view that giving money to poorer countries makes the situation worse. The key rationale is that financial support is a consequence to live a sedentary lifestyle of brainstorming. Individuals in unwealthy countries tend to live with government subsidies, they depend on tiny support money to pay for everything in daily life. For instance, investigations give proof that numerous people in wealthy countries are self-conscious about expenses and aware of work,...While poor countries are not. Therefore, financial aid for poorer countries does not seem justifiable.
Nevertheless, I believe that supporting unwealthy countries with money might help them to promote their national economy for several reasons. First, money from other countries will turn into a massive motivation. This is the first step to start-up, high spirit to recover their economy and youngster have more chance to get jobs. Second, governments can invest facilities to training youngsters who will change countries future. Besides, investment by support money for human in poor countries not only enhance their knowledge but also confirm that people here are appropriate.
In conclusion, while some argues about financial aid does not solve the problem, I am convinced that support money still has more facets to which people do not pay attention.
Topic:
Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty.
Therefore, developed countries would give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.
To what extend do you agree or disagree?
It is widely acknowledged that wealthy countries are using the wrong way to help poorer countries out of poverty, they ought to figure out the right track instead of financial aid. While this thinking is valid to a certain extent, I would contend that finance support also has both benefits and harm
It is conceivable why some subscribe to the view that giving money to poorer countries makes the situation worse. The key rationale is that financial support is a consequence to live a sedentary lifestyle of brainstorming. Individuals in unwealthy countries tend to live with government subsidies, they depend on tiny support money to pay for everything in daily life. For instance, investigations give proof that numerous people in wealthy countries are self-conscious about expenses and aware of work,...While poor countries are not. Therefore, financial aid for poorer countries does not seem justifiable.
Nevertheless, I believe that supporting unwealthy countries with money might help them to promote their national economy for several reasons. First, money from other countries will turn into a massive motivation. This is the first step to start-up, high spirit to recover their economy and youngster have more chance to get jobs. Second, governments can invest facilities to training youngsters who will change countries future. Besides, investment by support money for human in poor countries not only enhance their knowledge but also confirm that people here are appropriate.
In conclusion, while some argues about financial aid does not solve the problem, I am convinced that support money still has more facets to which people do not pay attention.