mar_b6707
Jan 29, 2013
Writing Feedback / 'requirements and conditions of studying in college' - one national curriculum? [5]
A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
----------------------------------------------------------------- ----- ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----- -------------------------------------
One of important question in an educational system is that whether a government should require all of its students in it's country to study the same national curriculum until they enter college or it must give the schools the autonomy concession. although some persons think that this idea may limit our training method but I think it has more advantageous than it's disadvantageous.
First and foremost reason that I agree with this idea is the requirements and conditions of studying in college. In many countries like our country for being eligible to study in university or college, all students must take part in an entrance exam. It is held in all cities the same and if we have not had a main educational syllables for training students, we face to some problems Such as different books and courses that each school people learn to it's students and so the students can not be examined in the entrance exam equally.
The second reason is that having a unique curriculum before accepting into a university can help students to decide about their major in university more better. They have learn about different major subjects, works and future in high school so when they want to enter a college they know their interests and talents more. if the curriculum of training is not the same different school has a unique learning method and syllables for themselves, so some of schools can finance on lucrative major and jobs more and in spite of this fact, it makes people to think that it has a better qualification in training and so a false competition happens between schools and even between students to take part in better schools.
So there exists some very qualified schools that belongs to a special group of rich students and some medium and low qualified school that ordinary students can register in them. So talent of students recognize and limit by their schools and the learning subjects in there but if a nation requires all of its students to study the same national curriculum and give a definite concession to school for searching about the best method of training, there exists a fair condition for each student to decide about their future and continue their careers in their beloved jobs.
A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
----------------------------------------------------------------- ----- ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----- -------------------------------------
One of important question in an educational system is that whether a government should require all of its students in it's country to study the same national curriculum until they enter college or it must give the schools the autonomy concession. although some persons think that this idea may limit our training method but I think it has more advantageous than it's disadvantageous.
First and foremost reason that I agree with this idea is the requirements and conditions of studying in college. In many countries like our country for being eligible to study in university or college, all students must take part in an entrance exam. It is held in all cities the same and if we have not had a main educational syllables for training students, we face to some problems Such as different books and courses that each school people learn to it's students and so the students can not be examined in the entrance exam equally.
The second reason is that having a unique curriculum before accepting into a university can help students to decide about their major in university more better. They have learn about different major subjects, works and future in high school so when they want to enter a college they know their interests and talents more. if the curriculum of training is not the same different school has a unique learning method and syllables for themselves, so some of schools can finance on lucrative major and jobs more and in spite of this fact, it makes people to think that it has a better qualification in training and so a false competition happens between schools and even between students to take part in better schools.
So there exists some very qualified schools that belongs to a special group of rich students and some medium and low qualified school that ordinary students can register in them. So talent of students recognize and limit by their schools and the learning subjects in there but if a nation requires all of its students to study the same national curriculum and give a definite concession to school for searching about the best method of training, there exists a fair condition for each student to decide about their future and continue their careers in their beloved jobs.
