Diesel
Oct 4, 2014
Writing Feedback / TOEFL: It is better to wait in patience than take action. [13]
Is patience a better choice for it can contribute to more adequate preparation? While it is a little true that patience furnishes us with enough time to refine our decision, it ignores that taking action can really make access to the solution of problems more quickly, avoiding delay on some critical circumstance particularly.
First, it is wiser to take action soon when individuals are confronted with emergency. A research conducted by experts from the Ministry of Public Medical Service, aiming at find the relationship between rates of the death of cancer and the time when cancer discovered, demonstrated that 76.8% of the ultimate death is caused by the delay of the treatment, especially when patients have realized the aggravating condition but deny to take immediate action. The conclusion suggests that the longer wait means the smaller possibility of curing their diseases, since hosts of viruses proliferate at such an amazing speed that the progression of disease seems faster than what we will imagine, and sometimes, the agents in one tissue can be transferred to another part, giving rise to more touchy problems owing to the lack of timely control.
Moreover, when states encounter with the secure conflicts, actions must be taken immediately. It is known to all that the matters concerning territorial rights should not be negotiated. Taking action without delay can exert an influence to suppress the arrogant status of invaders, maintain the independence of own country and guarantee the normal development of national economics. Take the Battle of Pearl Island as an example. The US troops' instant response to Japan's invasion has corrupted Japan's ambition to conquer the Pacific Region, preventing wars from expanding, thereby bringing back the global tense of World War II. The event can also be deciphered as defend of the US territorial interests, and the post-war prosper in American economics can be attributed to the event. That's why the rapid action acts as an indispensible role in national affairs.
Last but not the least, the environmental problems render the whole society to get involved with at once. Since the side-effects of economic development and urbanization such as pollutant emission have posed threats to human beings, ever-urgent becomes the public's engagement into retarding the process. For example, Global warming, which results from carbon emission as well as serves as a catalyst of thawing in polar glaciers, formerly leads to the increase of sea level with 5 centimeters per year, but according to recent data from the UN climate summit, after the global law on restrict carbon emission was implemented, the increase has been curbed within 2 centimeters per year and predicted even lower in the future decade
As discussed above, instant action can serve as a catalyst in coping with issues regardless of individuals, countries, or the whole society, so I must concede that taking action is better than waiting in patience.
Is patience a better choice for it can contribute to more adequate preparation? While it is a little true that patience furnishes us with enough time to refine our decision, it ignores that taking action can really make access to the solution of problems more quickly, avoiding delay on some critical circumstance particularly.
First, it is wiser to take action soon when individuals are confronted with emergency. A research conducted by experts from the Ministry of Public Medical Service, aiming at find the relationship between rates of the death of cancer and the time when cancer discovered, demonstrated that 76.8% of the ultimate death is caused by the delay of the treatment, especially when patients have realized the aggravating condition but deny to take immediate action. The conclusion suggests that the longer wait means the smaller possibility of curing their diseases, since hosts of viruses proliferate at such an amazing speed that the progression of disease seems faster than what we will imagine, and sometimes, the agents in one tissue can be transferred to another part, giving rise to more touchy problems owing to the lack of timely control.
Moreover, when states encounter with the secure conflicts, actions must be taken immediately. It is known to all that the matters concerning territorial rights should not be negotiated. Taking action without delay can exert an influence to suppress the arrogant status of invaders, maintain the independence of own country and guarantee the normal development of national economics. Take the Battle of Pearl Island as an example. The US troops' instant response to Japan's invasion has corrupted Japan's ambition to conquer the Pacific Region, preventing wars from expanding, thereby bringing back the global tense of World War II. The event can also be deciphered as defend of the US territorial interests, and the post-war prosper in American economics can be attributed to the event. That's why the rapid action acts as an indispensible role in national affairs.
Last but not the least, the environmental problems render the whole society to get involved with at once. Since the side-effects of economic development and urbanization such as pollutant emission have posed threats to human beings, ever-urgent becomes the public's engagement into retarding the process. For example, Global warming, which results from carbon emission as well as serves as a catalyst of thawing in polar glaciers, formerly leads to the increase of sea level with 5 centimeters per year, but according to recent data from the UN climate summit, after the global law on restrict carbon emission was implemented, the increase has been curbed within 2 centimeters per year and predicted even lower in the future decade
As discussed above, instant action can serve as a catalyst in coping with issues regardless of individuals, countries, or the whole society, so I must concede that taking action is better than waiting in patience.