Nguyenfromhanoi
Nov 5, 2021
Writing Feedback / Task 2 question: Some people believe it would be better to build houses in existing towns.... [2]
More houses are needed in many countries to cope with increasing populations.
Some people believe it would be better to build houses in existing towns and cities, while others think that the government should develop new towns in rural areas.
In our modern society, more and more contemporary attention has been placed on constructing new accommodation to meet the demand of the increasing population. There are valid opinions on both sides, which I will consider now.
On the one hand, it is commonly believed that a huge amount of money for construction purposes can be reduced if new houses are placed on the existing town. A well developed infrastructure in major cities is expected to be well integrated with any nearby resident. As a result, a significant amount of the state budget for building new services is unnecessary. In addition, living in the cities offer a wider range of well-paid careers, which means settling down in the urban areas is prioritized by the government and numerous citizens.
On the other hand, one major benefit of developing in rural areas, which also means lowering the population density is that the deteriorating tendency of polluting is probably stopped. Having an equal number of inhabitants in different areas also improved the average living standard considerably,as well as creating proper service for people living in the countryside,...
In conclusion, it is apparent that the benefit of developing in the countryside outweighs its disadvantages. Authority should converted more and more empty space for the benefit of nation,
More houses are needed in many countries to cope with increasing populations.
Some people believe it would be better to build houses in existing towns and cities, while others think that the government should develop new towns in rural areas.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In our modern society, more and more contemporary attention has been placed on constructing new accommodation to meet the demand of the increasing population. There are valid opinions on both sides, which I will consider now.
On the one hand, it is commonly believed that a huge amount of money for construction purposes can be reduced if new houses are placed on the existing town. A well developed infrastructure in major cities is expected to be well integrated with any nearby resident. As a result, a significant amount of the state budget for building new services is unnecessary. In addition, living in the cities offer a wider range of well-paid careers, which means settling down in the urban areas is prioritized by the government and numerous citizens.
On the other hand, one major benefit of developing in rural areas, which also means lowering the population density is that the deteriorating tendency of polluting is probably stopped. Having an equal number of inhabitants in different areas also improved the average living standard considerably,as well as creating proper service for people living in the countryside,...
In conclusion, it is apparent that the benefit of developing in the countryside outweighs its disadvantages. Authority should converted more and more empty space for the benefit of nation,
