Writing Feedback / Should sports athletes be rewarded with high salary? [3]

Essay Question:
Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think is fully justified while others think it is unfair.

My Attempt:

In the past few decades of sports history, most athletes either won gold medal in Olympic or major championship have been treated by the public as stars and heroes of their nation, and compensated with huge salaries just as the artists of movie and music industry. This has raised controversial debate whether this amount of compensation is reasonable as some professions had contributed to the society and country but were not rewarded with large salaries. In my opinion, I believe that it is justifiable to offer sports professional with high salary as their career have shorter life-cycle and require huge commitments.

To begin with, sports athletes are exposed to the risk of shorten career. Most fields consist of body contact during the competition or practice session. Additionally, competitions are always intense; thus, the likelihood of players suffer injuries are feasible, and some may even end their professions. Being incapable participate in this industry, they may easily find themselves struggle with their livings as they do not have other income stream as a result of lack of education and job experience. This can be easily evident from renowned sports competition such as National Basketball Association (NBA) and Australia Football League (AFL) where several players' glittering career was cut short by injuries. As this show, remunerating sports athlete with high salaries will allow them to warrant against their short term career.

Secondly, the amount of commitment require for every player in sports industry is massive as it is not a normal 8 hours job that begins from 9:00 am and ends at 6:00 pm. To be successful and competitive, athletes have to attend each training session that run from early morning to night with the aim of preparing the best condition of themselves for upcoming matches. Moreover, most competitions run throughout the year and players have to travel interstate frequently. Considering the mass volume of time and efforts of the players have to put, it is acceptable to compensate them with greater pay.

As a conclusion, it is justified to reward sports athlete with higher salaries in consideration of their risky career and commitments required. However, the society should not underrate the contributions of other profession. Any profession that contributes to the society and the country should be valued and respected.

Please comment and correct my essay. I am trying to improve my writing skills.

Thank you!

Writing Feedback / Should companies and individual pay to clean up the environment in proportion to their actions? [3]

Essay Question:
Many people believe that companies and individuals should pay to clean up the environment in proportion to the amount of pollution they have produced. Do you agree or disagree? Give your own opinion and examples.

My attempt:
Over the past decades of ecological history, various environmental problems that the world faced, some may due to natural catastrophe, but most of them are human caused. As a result, many countries have to bear pointless expenditure to rejuvenate the state of environment. Some people argued that every individual inclusive corporation is obliged to pay the price for their actions that lead to environmental degradation, while others believed that certain activities are just unavoidable. This essay will present both sides of arguments before a reasoned conclusion is drawn.

To begin with, Go Green defenders claimed that everyone should be penalized for their doings that caused environmental problems. Although this may be true to certain extent; however, some of the contamination results from human actions are just inevitable. In the modern era, many daily activities require energy to operate. Most of the energy that human used such as fuel and coals, contain with combustible materials which will contribute to the environment pollution. Despite the existence of renewable energy, this technology is still too expensive at the moment and not every individual can afford to have. Hence, putting these costs and blames on these low level incomes groups will definitely burden them.

However, certain activities that harmed the environment are primarily motivated for self-interest. This can be easily evident from irresponsible companies that earned large profits from their noncompliance's activities such as over logging. Another great example is where household family discarded unwanted objects or food recklessly just to avoid paying disposal or cleaning fee. All these self-centeredness actions have caused serious global warming. Thus, by imposing penalty on these selfish deeds, government can utilize this fund to restore and improve the ecosystem.

To sum up, there are clear supporting reasons for both sides of views; however, in my opinion, it is still believed that preserving the ecosystem is a responsibility of every person. Hence, any egotistical actions that resulted to environmental damage, they should be liable for the cost of rehabilitation flora and fauna.