Scholarship / About whether someone sent to prison before should talk to students about the danger of crimes [5]

Hey everybody,
this is written part of ielts test,and i need some advice on my essay in any aspect ,thanks so much. Appreciate that.

title--------Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later. Some people think that they are the best people to talk to school students about the danger of committing a crime. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

essay--------
Many people believe that good residents who was sent to prison before are the most suitable people communicating with students about bad outcomes of crimes.Personally I tend to agree that.

Those who argue that interaction between students and people who committed crimes is proper,typically make the following arguments.The first one is that students may gain a better understanding of crimes though the expression from these people.In another word,the terrible experience of people who committed crimes before is likely to deter criminal try from students,which reduce the rate of youth crime to some extend.

The second and related argument is that being communicators to people with criminal records probably have positive impact on avoiding re-offending,because this identity as a students' advisor could rebuild their self-confidence and self-esteem.With the same time,they may more clearly realize how terrible the things they did before is.

However,some people argue that this kind of talking could not bring expectant benefits for students.They are likely to have biases against what they hear,since the person being talking to them was a criminal before.Students with this extreme emotion could not get alters about crimes from communications

In conclusion,base on what I have discussed above,I do hold the opinion that good citizens who was sent to prison before is the most suitable people talking with students about criminal harms,although,some students do not recognize what they say.

-------thanks again