sy9891
Nov 27, 2017
Writing Feedback / The idea of using a standardized national curriculum in the entire nation [4]
Nation should require all of its students to study same national curriculum until they enter college
The idea of using a standardized national curriculum in the entire nation seems appealing, as the same study material is available to all the students. This ensures that various type of schools-government(central, state, municipal), private and not for profit, all offer the same kind of education. Indeed this approach eliminates the disparity in level of education being offered, if any. But its application sounds more relevant to the developing nation in comparison to developed nations. The issue has to be addressed by the members of national education committee for its viability & success.
While it does offer benefit like parity in level of education, but at the same time it needs to be assess if this is in good for entire nation. As different students might have different needs. No two students are of same level or have same interests. The capabilities, area of interest, their need for education might differ from each other. For some students, this curriculum might be challenging whereas, for some it might not be sufficient. Some may have interest in history, others might be willing to study maths or a foreign language.
Not just the subjects, the same content might pose a challenge to limit the imagination. As was in the case of the famous scientist Albert Einstein. He found school boring, as what he wanted to know he could not get answers by the teachers. Teachers were focused more on doing well in exam rather than learning. Another example which can be referred here is from the Roman history. The professors used poetry to teach their students. No fixed curriculum was followed by them. They picked a line or a prose and referred it to explain the concept science/history/philosophy. If we look at these examples then this very idea appears as hindrance in learning.
It is a nation's duty to decide what offers a better education and future to their most important asset. How they want to shape them. It depends of the economy, demographics of the nation. However, the best judge is the nation itself. Approach has different consequences in different aspects.
Please review my essay and share your feedback.
Nation should require all of its students to study same national curriculum until they enter college
the same kind of education for everyone?
The idea of using a standardized national curriculum in the entire nation seems appealing, as the same study material is available to all the students. This ensures that various type of schools-government(central, state, municipal), private and not for profit, all offer the same kind of education. Indeed this approach eliminates the disparity in level of education being offered, if any. But its application sounds more relevant to the developing nation in comparison to developed nations. The issue has to be addressed by the members of national education committee for its viability & success.
While it does offer benefit like parity in level of education, but at the same time it needs to be assess if this is in good for entire nation. As different students might have different needs. No two students are of same level or have same interests. The capabilities, area of interest, their need for education might differ from each other. For some students, this curriculum might be challenging whereas, for some it might not be sufficient. Some may have interest in history, others might be willing to study maths or a foreign language.
Not just the subjects, the same content might pose a challenge to limit the imagination. As was in the case of the famous scientist Albert Einstein. He found school boring, as what he wanted to know he could not get answers by the teachers. Teachers were focused more on doing well in exam rather than learning. Another example which can be referred here is from the Roman history. The professors used poetry to teach their students. No fixed curriculum was followed by them. They picked a line or a prose and referred it to explain the concept science/history/philosophy. If we look at these examples then this very idea appears as hindrance in learning.
It is a nation's duty to decide what offers a better education and future to their most important asset. How they want to shape them. It depends of the economy, demographics of the nation. However, the best judge is the nation itself. Approach has different consequences in different aspects.
Please review my essay and share your feedback.