rich1981
Oct 7, 2009
Essays / Legalizing Drugs, A fear of, Major decision - Cause-Effect Essay [3]
A great post by Sean, covering all the main points. You could also consider what is meant by the term 'Legalise.'
Would this mean that currently restricted substances would be 'freely' available from licensed vendors, in the same way that alcohol and cigarettes are sold?
Alternatively, legalize could mean to permit controlled use of certain drugs in accordance with a treatment programme as supervised by a physician.
In the Uk there is currently a small scale trial where heroin is being supplied by the state to addicts as part of a drug treatment plan. This is technically small scale legalisation, however people like myself, who don't have an addiction to heroin, can not purchase the drugs.
The preliminary findings of this study have shown a significant reduction in drug related crime (typically burglary, auto theft, shoplifting etc) and have also helped heroin addicts to rehabilitate by gradual dose reduction. If you search on news.bbc.co.uk you may be able to find some more information on this.
Current law enforcement policy on drugs in both the US and the UK focuses on restricting the supply of narcotics, both coming in to the country and at a street level. This has the effect of pushing up street prices of drugs and reducing drug purity (as dealers will add other substances to the drugs to make the weight up.)
The knock on effect of this is that addicts have to then commit more crime, to raise more money, to fund their habits. Partial legalisation (as in the UK example) for the most harmful drugs, heroin, crack, crystal meth etc, could well reduce crime and improve rehab rates, without the negative effect on public health that would be encountered if drugs were wholly de-regulated and legalised.
In short, the answer to the question on the effects of legalization, will naturally depend on the definition of legalization that you choose to work with.
A great post by Sean, covering all the main points. You could also consider what is meant by the term 'Legalise.'
Would this mean that currently restricted substances would be 'freely' available from licensed vendors, in the same way that alcohol and cigarettes are sold?
Alternatively, legalize could mean to permit controlled use of certain drugs in accordance with a treatment programme as supervised by a physician.
In the Uk there is currently a small scale trial where heroin is being supplied by the state to addicts as part of a drug treatment plan. This is technically small scale legalisation, however people like myself, who don't have an addiction to heroin, can not purchase the drugs.
The preliminary findings of this study have shown a significant reduction in drug related crime (typically burglary, auto theft, shoplifting etc) and have also helped heroin addicts to rehabilitate by gradual dose reduction. If you search on news.bbc.co.uk you may be able to find some more information on this.
Current law enforcement policy on drugs in both the US and the UK focuses on restricting the supply of narcotics, both coming in to the country and at a street level. This has the effect of pushing up street prices of drugs and reducing drug purity (as dealers will add other substances to the drugs to make the weight up.)
The knock on effect of this is that addicts have to then commit more crime, to raise more money, to fund their habits. Partial legalisation (as in the UK example) for the most harmful drugs, heroin, crack, crystal meth etc, could well reduce crime and improve rehab rates, without the negative effect on public health that would be encountered if drugs were wholly de-regulated and legalised.
In short, the answer to the question on the effects of legalization, will naturally depend on the definition of legalization that you choose to work with.
