peachykeen
Nov 15, 2009
Essays / Develop a thesis statement for KING LEAR: hidden loyalty/ blindness and sight / argument [9]
King Lear Essay Thesis; any tips on how I can find something to argue?
I have been trying to come up with a thesis for my King Lear essay for over a week now and I am still wrestling with it.
The essay topic is:
Compare the filial relationship of Gloucester and Edgar with that of Lear and Cordelia. How do these relationships comment upon one another? Consider the development of each relationship and it's conclusion. How does each relationship contribute to themes in the play, such as, self-knowledge, nature, appearance-and-reality? Avoid plot summary.
I want to say something about how both relationships come to a tragic and wholly preventable end due to the paternal figure's incorrect perception of reality and perhaps how the play cautions against the dangers of being led astray by false perceptions.
That just seems kind of obvious to me, though. It doesn't answer the so what question.
I've made a list of major similarities and differences in the courses of the two relationships throughout the play, but I can't seem to come up with anything that is really arguable.
Does anyone have any tips on how I can find something to argue? What do you do when you're stuck on your thesis?
I want to be clear that I'm not asking for a thesis, just any help on how to come up with one myself would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks!
Sarah
King Lear Essay Thesis; any tips on how I can find something to argue?
I have been trying to come up with a thesis for my King Lear essay for over a week now and I am still wrestling with it.
The essay topic is:
Compare the filial relationship of Gloucester and Edgar with that of Lear and Cordelia. How do these relationships comment upon one another? Consider the development of each relationship and it's conclusion. How does each relationship contribute to themes in the play, such as, self-knowledge, nature, appearance-and-reality? Avoid plot summary.
I want to say something about how both relationships come to a tragic and wholly preventable end due to the paternal figure's incorrect perception of reality and perhaps how the play cautions against the dangers of being led astray by false perceptions.
That just seems kind of obvious to me, though. It doesn't answer the so what question.
I've made a list of major similarities and differences in the courses of the two relationships throughout the play, but I can't seem to come up with anything that is really arguable.
Does anyone have any tips on how I can find something to argue? What do you do when you're stuck on your thesis?
I want to be clear that I'm not asking for a thesis, just any help on how to come up with one myself would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks!
Sarah