Undergraduate / 'only pupils of similar interests should be given admissions in schools?' -essay [3]

Some people believe that only pupils of similar interests should be given admissions in schools.Others are of the opinions that schools should be open to all children with varied interests. How far you agree or disagree with the above views. Give your opinion in not less than 250 words.

There are different perspective regarding how pupils should be grouped, from one side, some people believe that we should clasify students based on their level of interets and skills,while on the other side some people support that idea to mix all children with different interests.According to me, i believe both tactics have positive and negative faces.

First of all, grouping students with alike interests will accelerate to sharpen their skills as they are in tough competetive environment,
further more such way will filter and reveal the most talent people, however, no one can deny the benefits of such talent people and how the good impact will be gained on the future.

But, looking at the picture from another nook shows some other drawbacks to this opinion, while we creating leaders, scientist and athlets, we are leaving so many students in the deep hole and just because there are normal, undoubtedly, these normal or even below the average students will improve their abilities and capabilities by exchange the knowledge and behaviour with better once

such this system enhance the sharing and caring concepts beteen pupils which a huge value by itself.

in short, i believe open schools will be more effective on long period moreover it is very integrited with humanity traits that we all need.

Writing Feedback / 'the right of taking someone's life as a type of punishment' - capital essay [NEW]

Capital punishment is a brutal decision and should be abolished. Give your views in not less than 250 words if you agree or disgree with it

Today, there is a big quesion floating everywhere regarding the right of taking someone's life as a type of punishment,
with different perspectives, many stand against this and many others agree.
basiclly, we are living in socities groups like many other animal species, to do so, we should follow the fundemental rules of such complicated relationships between humans, this lead to apply a pre-defined laws for our negative behaviours to keep control over our existential

punishment is one of the effective rules that prevent some people from doing unaccepted or immoral actions.
Such rules has been defined thousands years ago, starting from the well-known Hamorabi Law that said: an eye
for eye, with implied alife must be taken for any other life taken.
today, many countries and even private orgnizations stand agains such law caliming that noone has the right to
take anyone's life.
according to me, i agree to some extent that capital punishment will stop many criminals from doing their atrocities
as they afraid of such very cruel punishment, but, looking at the capital punishment from another corner, from the corner where is the vectim's familly stand, will give some justifications to that

on the other hand, i strongly believe such punishment will not be fair without a fully controled procedure before any execution.
as may you know, one of the main risky points of applying this punishment is there is a chance of been mistakely executed and take one life simply for nothing.

hence, taking one life is unrecovered process, it should be applied only over the clear crimes, however, i do not think keeping some inside
a person for whole life is a big differance, it is simpley another way of killing.