Mehzah
Dec 8, 2016
Research Papers / Negative connotation of feminism and reasonings of why women today do not identify with the movement [3]
@ratoberry
I appreciate the stance you took at the beginning of this essay. You started as a person timid to the subject but dipped your toe in and got a first hand experience. As a male, what I respect is that you were able to cover many topics/reasons and get through your paper without ending on the note of "Men are pigs, death to all of them!" (Hyperbole ;D). To me, there isn't anything more off putting than to have someone who read a poorly written Buzzfeed article use that as their foundation of a "logical argument".
Where you start to lose me is when you move into the real "meat and potatoes" of you essay. Most of the body paragraphs seem more like summaries than true reasons. For instance, you mention a few times how changing the name could be beneficial but could also cause controversy due to where the focus is put (word or movement). That's all I got from that subtopic though. Really reach in for WHY this could be the major turning point or the possible huge mistake for the movement and apply this rationale to your other points.
You also mention the opposition dualism dichotomy we face right now. Dig deeper on how this could be reversed and would prove useful for the movement. Like you said, our media is quick to tag things like "-ism" onto whatever they can but many times those tags divert our attention from the true argument at hand and feminism as a whole. Prove to me why articulation like this detracts from the feminist movement, more specifically how the media has put their own spin on these ideas.
Wonderful job overall, you are a very concise and clear writer but dig deeper to persuade me to your thoughts :)
@ratoberry
I appreciate the stance you took at the beginning of this essay. You started as a person timid to the subject but dipped your toe in and got a first hand experience. As a male, what I respect is that you were able to cover many topics/reasons and get through your paper without ending on the note of "Men are pigs, death to all of them!" (Hyperbole ;D). To me, there isn't anything more off putting than to have someone who read a poorly written Buzzfeed article use that as their foundation of a "logical argument".
Where you start to lose me is when you move into the real "meat and potatoes" of you essay. Most of the body paragraphs seem more like summaries than true reasons. For instance, you mention a few times how changing the name could be beneficial but could also cause controversy due to where the focus is put (word or movement). That's all I got from that subtopic though. Really reach in for WHY this could be the major turning point or the possible huge mistake for the movement and apply this rationale to your other points.
You also mention the opposition dualism dichotomy we face right now. Dig deeper on how this could be reversed and would prove useful for the movement. Like you said, our media is quick to tag things like "-ism" onto whatever they can but many times those tags divert our attention from the true argument at hand and feminism as a whole. Prove to me why articulation like this detracts from the feminist movement, more specifically how the media has put their own spin on these ideas.
Wonderful job overall, you are a very concise and clear writer but dig deeper to persuade me to your thoughts :)