Pham Hoai Trang
Sep 26, 2021
Writing Feedback / Schools should emphasize national literature and history for various reasons [2]
I feel that school should emphasize national literature and history for various reasons. To begin with, youngsters like learning about their surroundings and by studying their country's idea, culture, and history, they begin to create a sense of identity. Simultaneously, this strategy appeals to parents who have investigated the same literature and historical events as their children and can assist them with schooling. For example, English youngsters read Shakespeare and learn about the Battle of Hastings in the same way that their parents did, demonstrate a generational educational continuity. Finally, educators have a scope of instruction due to the concentration on national literature and history, make curriculum creation easy
On the contrary, pupils may face unnecessary difficulties and misunderstanding when studying world events and foreign novel. I don't think it's beneficial to teach French or American history to an English child who hasn't studied his country history in depth. Certainly, the child will be able to comprehend historical events that occurred in London rather than Paris or Washington. Similarly, any exposure to international literature may necessitate some understanding of a foreign language or translation abilities. Primary and secondary school students are just unprepared for such difficulties.
The importance of literature and history for pupils
I feel that school should emphasize national literature and history for various reasons. To begin with, youngsters like learning about their surroundings and by studying their country's idea, culture, and history, they begin to create a sense of identity. Simultaneously, this strategy appeals to parents who have investigated the same literature and historical events as their children and can assist them with schooling. For example, English youngsters read Shakespeare and learn about the Battle of Hastings in the same way that their parents did, demonstrate a generational educational continuity. Finally, educators have a scope of instruction due to the concentration on national literature and history, make curriculum creation easy
On the contrary, pupils may face unnecessary difficulties and misunderstanding when studying world events and foreign novel. I don't think it's beneficial to teach French or American history to an English child who hasn't studied his country history in depth. Certainly, the child will be able to comprehend historical events that occurred in London rather than Paris or Washington. Similarly, any exposure to international literature may necessitate some understanding of a foreign language or translation abilities. Primary and secondary school students are just unprepared for such difficulties.