hmwilliam
Oct 19, 2010
Research Papers / Help in formulating a research question on the subject of crime deterrence. [7]
A narrower topic would probably serve you best. As I learned in undergrad, you want your research to be elegant and intuitive. With that said, it is definitely advisable to narrow any topic so you can provide a take on a subject that is, in some respects, unique.
If you chose to go with this topic, there are several angles you can take. One that immediately stands out to me is a comparative analysis between the 3 methods of jurisdictional transferring you mentioned above. You could examine States, the method of transfer each employs (jurisdictional waiver, juvenile transfer, and concurrent jurisdiction), and see if one method in particular increases the frequency of juveniles being prosecuted as adults. You can then formulate your hypothesis or research question.
For example, if I were writing this I might say the following:
At risk of being permanently criminalized, jurisdictional waiver, juvenile transfer, and concurrent jurisdiction could effectively serve to deter juveniles from the commission of serious crime(s). This policy, though widely implemented, has received mixed reviews on its ability to impact the crime rate of juveniles to a degree of statistical significance. With that in mind, I seek to examine whether or not jurisdictional transfer of juveniles is partially or wholly flawed by exploring the difference in differences between the three methods of implementation. Does the method by which a State transfers juveniles to adult court increase the frequency of juveniles prosecuted as adults, and is that frequency met with a corresponding effect that is attributable to the deterrent nature of this policy?
Clearly this is just one of many positions you can take that may not be as thoroughly researched. The research question(s) you arrive at will probably differ from the example provided above. But, at the very least, hopefully this gives you an example of a direction you could take.
A narrower topic would probably serve you best. As I learned in undergrad, you want your research to be elegant and intuitive. With that said, it is definitely advisable to narrow any topic so you can provide a take on a subject that is, in some respects, unique.
If you chose to go with this topic, there are several angles you can take. One that immediately stands out to me is a comparative analysis between the 3 methods of jurisdictional transferring you mentioned above. You could examine States, the method of transfer each employs (jurisdictional waiver, juvenile transfer, and concurrent jurisdiction), and see if one method in particular increases the frequency of juveniles being prosecuted as adults. You can then formulate your hypothesis or research question.
For example, if I were writing this I might say the following:
At risk of being permanently criminalized, jurisdictional waiver, juvenile transfer, and concurrent jurisdiction could effectively serve to deter juveniles from the commission of serious crime(s). This policy, though widely implemented, has received mixed reviews on its ability to impact the crime rate of juveniles to a degree of statistical significance. With that in mind, I seek to examine whether or not jurisdictional transfer of juveniles is partially or wholly flawed by exploring the difference in differences between the three methods of implementation. Does the method by which a State transfers juveniles to adult court increase the frequency of juveniles prosecuted as adults, and is that frequency met with a corresponding effect that is attributable to the deterrent nature of this policy?
Clearly this is just one of many positions you can take that may not be as thoroughly researched. The research question(s) you arrive at will probably differ from the example provided above. But, at the very least, hopefully this gives you an example of a direction you could take.