Writing Feedback / The average educational spending on each student have rocketed continuously for more than 20 years [NEW]

School should ask students to evaluate their teachers. Agree or disagree.
Some of my expressions are not accurate. Please help me to modify them.

The average educational spending on each student have rocketed continuously for more than 20 years. In contrast, the public is not satisfied with the outcome of that huge investment. Most common people and educational specialists agree to the conclusion that the quality of education did not increase correspondingly. To cope with this problem, some experts propose that students should be asked to rate the performance of their teachers. I strongly approve this proposal.

To begin with, students know their teache better in the domain of teaching effect than any other people, such as headteachers, supervisors of the government. If we can compare the teaching service as a kind of commodity, say clothes, the people who know the quality of this commodity best must be who use it, say patrons. Students are the patrons of the educational service and have the right to evaluate its quality. However, nowadays, the measurement system of our educational service is consisted with few supervisors who just meet the teachers less than five days a year. Then the outcome of this measurement is dubious.

Additionally, if students have the chance to evaluate their teachers, the attitude of teachers will change significantly. In the past, local newspaper often reported that students were physically punished by their teachers, only because they did not finish their homework. When students have the access to express their opinion of their teachers, this kind of thing will distinct. Consequently, in order to get a reasonable score, teachers will pay more attention to their students' need. For example, a teacher may spent their off-campus time to help students resolve academic questions.

What is more, under the pressure of evluation, teachers will try their best to improve the quality of teaching. For instance, there are many old-fashioned teachers in our education system today. They are not willing to catch up with the new trend of technology. Some of them even do not know how to use computer to make slides. Under the evaluation pressure, many of them will change their obsolete teaching style and apply new factors, such as slides and videos.

Admittedly, some drawbacks of this evaluation means should also been considered. The most obvious one is that students may easily abuse their right. Some students, especially those too youny to understand rulls, may judge their teacher by like or dislike. But, these disadvantages can be demilished if we make precaution in advance. In conclusion, the advantages of introducing students to evaluate their teachers will outdo its disadvantages in the long run.

Writing Feedback / TOEFL: selecting / processing information- very important skill a person should learn [3]

The whole topic descreption is here: What is a very important skill a person should learn in order to be successful in the world today? Choose one skill and use specific resons and examples to support your choice.

My writing:

Many skills are contributing to the succeed of modern people, such as reading, writing, communication. The ability to make use of massive information is the one may outdo others in this Web 2.0 Times.

Today , information are produced by both media and individuals. A study shows that the number of books published each year after 2000 surpasses the sum of that before 1900. It means people have more choices today. However, disadvantages also emerge in this trend. Though more books are in the market to be choose, less people spend their time to read a book in depth. In addition, the wide-spreade Internet, especially after the advent of social network, makes everybody can generate information and shared it with others. Each day, millions of blogs and vedios spread from one person to the other by the help of the Internet.

To adjust to this new trend, people make some changes correspondingly. One main adaptation is to lengthen their time on reading and watching. Commonly, people spend more than three hours surfing on the Internet. Some acquire much useful information from it. For instance, scholars can easily chech information by using Google Scholar Search. Unfortunately, most of them waste much time and are lost in massive information. They switch from page to page without realizing the time passing by.

Several tactics are recommened to cope with massive information. The first one is called Time Management, which applys many means to restrict time consumption on each task. According to this method, one can save much time on meaningless wandering in the Internet world. For example, in order to reduce the time of reading news, one can set a 30 minutes alarm clock. The other is to simplify the information sources. To be specific, it means exclude the sources that are seldom used or less useful, and concentrates on hands of main sources.

To conclude, as the amount of information increasing dramatically, people have to acquire the skill of selecting and processing information efficiently. This skill, to some degree, determines one's achievement in today's world.

Thanks for your help in advance.