Unanswered [1] | Urgent [0]
  

Posts by ChicitaGatita
Joined: Feb 18, 2009
Last Post: Feb 27, 2009
Threads: 2
Posts: 7  
From: Australia

Displayed posts: 9
sort: Latest first   Oldest first  | 
ChicitaGatita   
Feb 27, 2009
Writing Feedback / Lit Review (Borderline Personality Disorder) [3]

In reference to: https://essayforum.com/dissertations/lit-review-show-critically-analysed-studies-5908/

Hi All

Warning - this is going to be long. I'd really appreciate people's feedback about what I've written so far. Particularly would you think about whether or not the information I'm providing is actually relevant given my research question. Please let me know what bits are relevant and why and which bits aren't relevant and why. Also would you see if you can identify areas of research that I need to explore that I haven't yet. I'm too "over it" to be able to step back and see this...

CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this thesis is to challenge the validity of the diagnosis of Borderline Personality Disorder as meeting the criteria for a personality disorder.

Personality disorders are defined in the DSM-IV as "...an enduring pattern of inner experience and behaviour that deviates markedly from the expectations of the individual's culture, is pervasive and inflexible, has an onset in adolescence or early adulthood, is stable over time, and leads to distress or impairment". As the definition of personality disorders stipulate that the inner experience and behaviour of the person is pervasive, inflexible and stable over time the diagnosis of a patient with a personality disorder indicates the patient is unlikely to significantly improve even with treatment. The patient diagnosed with a PD is perceived as having a fundamental and irreparable flaw in their personality.

BPD is defined in the DSM-IV as "...a pattern of instability in interpersonal relationships, self-image, and affects, and marked impulsivity". The diagnostic criteria for BPD consist of nine criteria, only five of which are required to be met in order to be diagnosed with BPD. The latitude in diagnostic criteria results in their being 256 unique combinations of criterion that allow for a diagnosis of BPD. The hypothesis of this study arose from research which indicates that a child who is a victim of parental incest is more likely to have difficulty maintaining and sustaining healthy interpersonal relationships , has difficulty maintaining positive self-image , has emotional instability , and engages in impulsive behaviour (mirroring the definition of BPD as above)

It is expected that sustained, positive interpersonal relationships found outside the family of origin in adulthood combined with the opportunity to engage in psychotherapeutic type interventions (one on one counselling, support groups, group therapy, personal development courses etc) the victims of childhood parental incest can experience the interpersonal support and skills necessary to sufficiently heal the wounds created by the incest to no longer meet the criteria for BPD.

The aim of this research is to demonstrate that female victims of childhood parental incest perceive themselves as having been able to have met the diagnostic criteria for BPD in their late teens to mid twenties, and that those same subjects are less likely to currently perceive themselves as meeting the diagnostic criteria for BPD, thus demonstrating that someone can meet the diagnostic criteria of BPD but not the definition of a personality disorder (i.e. inflexible and stable over time).

CHAPTER 2 - BACKGROUND TO THIS THESIS

Borderline Personality Disorder is a relatively new diagnosis in the history of psychological disorders. There exists significant controversy within the psychological profession regarding the validity of BPD as a diagnosis. This chapter aims to provide an overview of these controversies and covers the history and development of personality disorders as a distinct Axis in the DSM-IV, the more specific history and development of BPD as a diagnosis within this Axis, the etiology of BPD, the relationship between trauma and BPD, other concerns with BPD as a diagnosis, and the research on the effectiveness of psychological interventions in treating BPD.

THE HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS AS A CATEGORY OF PSYCHOLOGICAL DISORDERS
One of the two Axis in the DSM-IV is dedicated to psychological disorders known as "Personality Disorders", however, the use of clear diagnostic criteria to define personality disorders as a whole, and clear diagnostic criteria to differentiate between individual personality disorders is only a very recent development in the history of psychology.

Personality theory and research into personality within the discipline of psychology began to flourish in the mid 20th century with the work of those such as Freud, Allport and Eysenk (Hall & Lindzey, 1970 ). At this stage the work on personality was based on decades of clinical observation (Fowler, K.A., O'Donahue, W., and Lilienfield, S.O., 2007 ). Work in the area of personality then became less of a focus in the field of psychology as it moved towards what Cloninger defines as more categorical, behavioural biological approaches to psychological disorders. Whilst some personality disorders (such as schizoid personality and paranoid personality) were included in earlier versions of the DSM it was not until the DSM-III that the construct of "Personality Disorders" was created to reflect the belief that personality disorders were considered to be significantly different from the range of other disorders included in the DSM. The DSM-III was the first version of the DSM which created two separate diagnostic Axis to differentiate between "clinical conditions" (Axis I) and personality disorders (Axis II) (Fowler, K.A., O'Donahue, W., and Lilienfield, S.O., 2007 ).

HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF BORDERLINE PERSONALITY DISORDER AS A DIAGNOSIS
"Borderline" was a label first used by Stern (1938 ) who did not fit neatly into the then current psychiatric categories of neurotic or psychotic. At that time psychopathology was viewed as a continuum from normal to neurotic to psychotic (Linehan, M.M. 1993 ). Stern used the term borderline to refer to patients who generally appeared to fit the criteria for neurotic but demonstrated brief psychotic periods (Freeman, A., Stone, M., Martin, D., and Keinecke, M. ). Kernberg (1967 ) created the term borderline personality organization. He used the word personality to reflect the enduring nature of these patients thoughts, feelings and behaviours. Patients who were categorised as having borderline personality organization tended to respond to unpleasant realities with immature and drastic responses such as cutting or denial, and whilst not acutely psychotic became significantly disorganised cognitively when under stress with psychotic like symptoms such as splitting (Bradley, R., Zittel Conklin, C., & Westen, D. 2007 ).

Kernberg's work was the basis of much of the future work on BPD including the eventual description of BPD in the DSM-III. According to Bradley et al (2007 ) Grinker, Werble, and Drye (1968) were the first to attempt to create empirically grounded diagnostic criteria for what they referred to as the borderline syndrome. The Diagnostic Interview for Borderline Personality Disorder was then developed by Gunderson and his colleagues (Gunderson & Singer, 1975 ; Gunderson & Kolb, 1978 ; Kolb, & Austin, 1981 ). The definition and diagnostic criteria for BPD as set out in the DSM-III was overseen by Spitzer, the editor of the DSM-III who reviewed clinical and research literature, and consulted with clinicians specialising in the treatment of patients with borderline personality characteristics. He then created a set of potential diagnostic criteria which was evaluated by a national survey of psychiatrists. It was the resulting set of diagnostic criteria that was identified via this process which became the basis of the DSM-III (Spitzer, Endicott, & Gibbon, 1979 ).

Many researchers (i.e. Cloninger, R.C. 2007 ; XXXX; XXXX) have serious concerns about the validity of BPD as a diagnosis and this will be explored in greater detail further in this chapter (NB. I will flesh this sentence out as I continue writing this chapter and am better able to summarise these concerns).

ETIOLOGY OF BORDERLINE PERSONALITY DISORDER
One of the difficulties with BPD is that there is no clear path which leads towards the development of BPD. Many researchers (Paris 1999 ; XXXX; XXXX) believe that BPD occurs as a result of the interaction between genetic, biological, social and psychological factors. Whilst looking at each of these factors separately is useful for obtaining a grasp on how each of these factors may contribute to the development of BPD, the interaction of these factors is complex. For simplicity each of these factors will initially be explored individually and then the interaction of these factors will be discussed.

Genetic Factors
Research has shown that various emotional characteristics which are associated with BPD such as affective lability, impulsive behaviour, and neuroticism, are at least in part inheritable (Jang, Livesley, Vernon, & Jackson, 1996 ; Livesly, Jang, Schroeder, & Jackson, 1993 ; Paris, 2000 ; Plomin, Defries, McClearn, & Rutter, 1997 ; Silk, 2000 ) and that personality traits are heritable (Plomin, Chipuer, & Loehiin, 1990 ). However, to date, studies using linkage and adoption have not identified specific genetic vulnerabilities towards the development of BPD (Freeman, A., Stone, M., Martin, D., and Keinecke, M. ).

White, Gunderson, Zanarini, and Hudson (2003 ) reviewed the research on psychological disorders within the BPD patients family of origin. They found little support to link schizophrenia or bipolar disorders in family of origin with the development of BPD, some support for a familial link between depression and BPD, and a stronger level of support linking impulse spectrum disorders (including BPD) with the development of BPD. However, this does not identify how these familial links result (or don't result) in the development of BPD. Teasing out which part of this is due to genetics, which is due to biology (i.e. neurological development of the brain as effected by instability in the family of origin) and which is due to social and psychological factors is a significantly harder task.

Biological Factors
Studies which use positron-emission tomography (PET) indicate that patients with BPD may have decreased metabolism in their prefrontal cortex (Adams, Bernat, & Luscher, 2001 ; Paris, 1999 ) which is the area responsible for executive function, affect regulation and behavioural inhibition. This may well be linked to some of the characteristics of BPD such as impulsive behaviour, emotional lability and disorganisation (particularly when under stress). However, the cause of this decreased metabolism is not clear and could be as a result of social/psychological factors such as severe or chronic abuse or neglect as a child, a chaotic home environment, disorganised attachment or separation/early loss.

Other studies using neuroimaging indicate that those with BPD are hyperreactive to emotional stimuli as reflected by heightened activation of the amygdale (Donegan et al., 2003 ; Herpertz et al., 2001 ). However, other research has demonstrated decreased amygdale activity (Driessen et al., 2000 ). One explanation for this seemingly contradictory and mutually exclusive results could be that those BPD patients who are more prone to dissociation may indeed have decreased amygdale activity.

Social Factors
Research has indicated that some personality disorders are more frequently diagnosed in men, and others in women. The DSM-IV-TR (APA, 2000 ) stated that women are more frequently diagnosed with BPD, histrionic personality disorder, and dependant personality disorder, whereas men are more frequently diagnosed with antisocial personality disorder, narcissistic personality disorder, and obsessive compulsive disorder). However, other research (Golomb, Fava, Abraham, and Rosenbaum 1995 ) found no significant gender differences in the diagnosis of BPD, histrionic personality disorder, and dependent personality disorder.

In regards to the research which indicates patterns of gender and diagnosis - Is this because there are inherent personality differences between men and women that lead to observably different trends in psychopathology? Or is this a result of cultural biases towards the rearing of children which lead to differences in personality (i.e. the emphasis on certain personality traits - both functional and dysfunctional - that is gender specific)? Or is cultural biases in the way diagnosticians view behaviour (i.e. the angry man is antisocial, the angry woman is borderline)? At this point there is research which supports all of these possibilities but no clear answers.

Some research question whether there is a gender bias both in the diagnostic decision making process and in the diagnostic criteria itself. Warner (1978 ) provided clinicians with a patient profile identical in all aspects except gender. The patient profile was supposed to describe a patient with histrionic personality disorder. The outcome of this study demonstrated that when the patient's assigned gender was male the diagnosis was more likely to be that of antisocial personality disorder, and when the patient's assigned gender was female the diagnosis tended to be histrionic personality disorder. Other researchers (i.e. Caplan, 1987 ; Landrine, 1989 ) have argued that healthy individuals who meet extreme examples of gender stereotypes are labelled with psychopathology diagnosis unfairly.

Widiger & Spitzer (1991 ) reviewed potential sources of gender bias when diagnosis personality disorders and concluded that in order to protect against false positives due to gender bias it would be necessary for the DSM to make more explicit and concrete the threshold at which behaviours are deemed to be maladaptive.

Psychological Factors

The Interaction of These Factors
ChicitaGatita   
Feb 27, 2009
Undergraduate / Admission Essay - Subject of importance to me (Diseases Du Jour) [4]

Hi Egonz

Good on you for posting and asking for feedback. I get really anxious and embarrassed when I let other people read what I write. Partly that's because I'm a terrible perfectionist and hypercritical of my writing. So bear this in mind when you read my feedback here.

Your first paragraph starts with a sentence that is not backed up. Where did you get the term "Diseases du jour"? What does it mean? What research is there that shows that there are "Diseases du jour" and that they "arise every decade or so"? Be careful not to make sweeping, unsubstantiated statements.

I believe I understand what you mean - that a specific psychological disorder is discussed more widely within both practice and the popular media thus raising psychologist/psychiatrists awareness of the disorder resulting in the psychologists/psychiatrists being more likely to consider it as a possible diagnosis increasing the rates of diagnosis. But it you say something like this make sure you back it up by studies.

It sounds as if you are saying that psych disorders are included in the DSM purely to allow practitioners to bill insurance companies, which isn't true and might offend some of your readers. I suggest doing a bit more research into how the DSM is reviewed and what criteria are required for a disorder to be included.

The same goes for your comments regarding "side deals" between practitioners. I understand your cynicism and passion for integrity but I don't believe at the level of the DSM that these kind of "side deals" can occur due to the rigour of the review process. Once again you will risk offending and alienating some of your readers.

Your comments about "hysterical reactions", "attention seekers taking advantage of treatment centres", people being accused of horrifying acts and doctors using magazine quizzes rather than valid and reliable psych measures need to be substantiated. Be very wary of making broad generalisations, particularly such negative ones.

Your comments about MPD - now dissociative identity disorder, PTSD and Bi Polar Disorder are only slightly more substantiated and give only one side of the argument. I think the valid concern you have is the need for ongoing research into the validity of psych disorders but it may be better in this essay to give examples of the debate rather than taking a side. The people who are reading your essay will most likely have a lot more knowledge of the research in these issues than you. The important thing is to demonstrate your passion for integrity and validity in psychology/psychiatry as a profession.

I suggest being more considered and moderate in your comments about how you perceive the profession. Be passionate about what you love but don't talk negatively about others unless you can clearly substantiate what you're saying. I am passionate about correct diagnosis also so I understand completely where you're coming from. Just remember that things aren't black and white, it's about questioning, exploring and testing assumptions.

Keep posting as you re-draft (I won't be offended if you don't take on board my comments) as this is the best way to get helpful feedback and improve.

Cheers!
CG :)
ChicitaGatita   
Feb 27, 2009
Undergraduate / "Changing lives of so many people" ; UT Austin Transfer- SOP [5]

Hi FrankTank!

Good luck with your application, I'm excited for you.

I like the introduction as it hooked me in and made me intrigued. There was some confusion for me regarding the "milk of amnesia" being added to the IV and your reaction. Initially I thought you were the patient so I became confused and had to go back and re-read the first paragraph. When I realised you were an observer I still wasn't sure what your role was and a little more clarity would be helpful. I like that you're "painting a picture" rather than providing facts but it would be nice to know how you ended up in the room while surgery was occuring, because I was left with more questions than answers about you.

I have no medical training so what I'm about to say may not be appropriate but it seemed a bit melodramatic to say that he was able to return to his family and continue his life. Did the constriction in his intestine threaten his life? I can see that potentially it might if it meant the patient wasn't able to digest/excrete properly. It would be helpful to have a bit more fleshing out of the patient's prior symptoms, how it had effected him and what the consequences of no treatment would be. Then I'd be better able to appreciate the value of the surgery. It doesn't matter how mundane surgery is (gallstones) to the patient it's important so don't worry if it's not life threatening.

The phrase "I have the necessary skills, dedication, and motivation required to become an excellent physician" is a stock standard type of phrase and many, many applicants will say something like this. Remember anyone can say I am X,Y, and Z but what the admissions committee will be looking for are examples from your own life that demonstrate these qualities. So for example you volunteering shows your dedication to helping people, your willingness to help with the mundane (daily activities), your patience and compassion, your ability to build rapport and develop relationships. I would actually make that explicit. Your ability to view surgery shows your ability to deal with blood and gore, to remain calm in a stressful situation, etc, etc.

If possible I would also talk about your ability to work long hours, to problem solve and make decisions under extreme pressure.

Have a think about what qualities, skills etc a doctor needs. Create a list of these and then see if you can provide examples from your own life that demonstrate this.

I hope this helps.

I'm so excited for you

Cheers!
Amanda
ChicitaGatita   
Feb 19, 2009
Dissertations / Lit Review: How do I show I've critically analysed the studies I've read? [11]

Kevin - you are wonderful. Thank you. I really love how enthusiastic and excited you are about lit reviews. It's wonderfully inspiring and gets me motivated.

And thank you so much for providing such concrete and specific assistance (Google scholar and how to search, suggesting one paragraph per study - then organising, and the wonderful link which provides a great overview of the process).

I feel like I must be incredibly inept but how do you know when you've read "ALL the major progress that has been made"? How do I now I haven't missed an important study?

Also - One of the things that I find the most difficult aspect of reading is that EVERYTHING I read seems interesting and relevant (ok maybe not everything!). I do really care about my topic and find it v v interesting. Any suggestions as to how ensure that I don't get sidetracked by interesting but not imperative for the purpose of my thesis?

You and this forum have helped me get excited and motivated. Instead of overwhelmed and avoidant. Thank you so much :)
ChicitaGatita   
Feb 19, 2009
Dissertations / Lit Review: How do I show I've critically analysed the studies I've read? [11]

Bless you Kat13! :)

Thanks Sean

Borderline Personality Disorder is the condition. I don't believe that BPD is a valid psychological disorder which is my initial motivation to do a thesis on BPD. I want to demonstrate that BPD does not meet the DSM-IV definition of a PD (personality disorder).

PDs are defined in the DSM-IV as "...an enduring pattern of inner experience and behaviour that deviates markedly from the expectations of the individual's culture, is pervasive and inflexible, has an onset in adolescence or early adulthood, is stable over time, and leads to distress or impairment". As the definition of personality disorders stipulate that the inner experience and behaviour of the person is pervasive, inflexible and stable over time the diagnosis of a patient with a personality disorder indicates the patient is unlikely to significantly improve even with treatment. The patient diagnosed with a PD is perceived as having a fundamental and irreparable flaw in their personality.

BPD is defined in the DSM-IV as "...a pattern of instability in interpersonal relationships, self-image, and affects, and marked impulsivity". The hypothesis of this study arose from two main outcomes of research. Firstly research indicates that a child who is a victim of parental incest is more likely to have difficulty maintaining and sustaining healthy interpersonal relationships, has difficulty maintaining positive self-image, has emotional instability, and engages in impulsive behaviour - all of which are diagnostic criteria of BPD. Secondly research indicates that victims of childhood incest can overcome the above issues which demonstrates that someone diagnosed with BPD can then heal sufficiently to no longer meet the criteria, demonstrating that BPD does not meet the definition of a PD.

The aim of this research is to demonstrate that victims of childhood parental incest perceive themselves as having met the diagnostic criteria for BPD in their late teens, early-mid twenties, and that those same subjects are less likely to currently perceive themselves as meeting the diagnostic criteria for BPD if they have had the necessary interpersonal support to heal the wounds caused by their childhood abuse.

It is expected that sustained, positive interpersonal relationships found outside the family of origin in adulthood combined with sustained psychotherapeutic type interventions (one on one counselling, support groups, group therapy, personal development courses etc) the victims of childhood parental incest can experience the interpersonal support and skills necessary to sufficiently heal the wounds created by the incest to no longer meet the criteria for BPD.

If you can seen any flaws in my logic please let me know.

JUST A GENTLE REMINDER THAT I'D LOVE SOMEONE SUGGESTING A STUDY/ARTICLE THAT PROVIDES A WONDERFUL EXAMPLE OF BEST PRACTICE LIT REVIEW :)

Cheers!
Amanda
ChicitaGatita   
Feb 19, 2009
Dissertations / Lit Review: How do I show I've critically analysed the studies I've read? [11]

Good luck!!

Thanks Kevin :) Of course you're right that writing is communication LOL. What I meant was that my strength is in face to face communication rather than academic writing. Formal academic writing makes me very anxious, however, I can run training and present seminars and courses and thoroughly enjoy myself.

Thank you for your suggestion to criticise each study individually and then synthesise to pull it together in the end. This sounds so simple it's a bit embarrassing that I couldn't see this. I'm still really keen to see an example of "best practice" lit review. If anyone can suggest a study that includes this I'd be forever grateful.

This thesis is only a minor thesis of 10,000-15,000 words so my lit review will be 4000-5000 words. Can anyone give me an indication of how many studies I should be referring to given this word limit? I know it's a bit like asking "How long is a piece of string?" but an indication would be helpful to make sure I'm in the ballpark. I have a tendency to feel like I've never read enough which results in me becoming overwhelmed and struggling to put limits on my work. This is one of the reasons I've not been able to complete my thesis.

Cheers!
Amanda

PS - COULD SOMEONE PLEASE POST A REPLY AS THIS FORUM WONT ALLOW ME TO POST TWICE IN A ROW AND I DON'T WANT TO RESPOND TO SEAN HERE AS THE POST WOULD BE VERY VERY LONG! YOU CAN JUST POST A "HI" SO I CAN POST :)
ChicitaGatita   
Feb 18, 2009
Dissertations / Lit Review: How do I show I've critically analysed the studies I've read? [11]

Hi Sean

Thank you for your reply and asking for more information. I didn't know how much detail to provide. I didn't want to put anyone off by posting too long a post. I really appreciate your help.

My research question is: Can being a female victim of parental incest as a child lead to erroneously being diagnosed with BPD as an adult?

My hypotheses are:
Hypothesis 1: Having been a female victim of incest by a parent during childhood is significantly correlated to self-identified symptoms of BPD as an adult.

Hypothesis 2. The strength of the correlation proposed in hypothesis 1, reduces as a function of age.

The participants will be asked to spend 5 minutes writing about how their experience of incest by a parent effects them currently. They will then be requested to complete the Borderline Symptom Inventory (BSI) based on their current assessment of themselves. The participants will then be asked to spend 5 minutes writing about how their experience of incest by a parent effected them in their late teens to mid twenties. After completing this short writing they will be asked to complete the BSI again, this time retrospectively recording their perception of themselves during their late teens to mid twenties

So I'm attempting to demonstrate that females who were sexually abused by a parent as a child when self-assessing retrospectively will be more likely to meet the criteria for a diagnosis of BPD when compared with their current self-assessment on the BSI.

I appreciate that a longitudinal study would be much more rigorous, as would being assessed by a qualified psychologist versus self-assessment but this is outside the scope of what is possible in a minor thesis for my coursework/placement/minor thesis Masters. If you see other limitations or issues with my hypotheses or method I'd love to hear them.

In regards to the existing literature - There is a plethora of articles which question the validity of BPD as a PD. Following is a summary of the main points in the literature which I've identified to date which bring into question the diagnostic validity of BPD:

* There is a plethora of literature which looks at co-morbidity with an amazingly wide range of other psychological conditions (both Axis I and Axis II - depression, PTSD, OCD, eating disorders, substance abuse, and a range of PDs etc, etc).

* The literature refers to the level of variability in presentation of symptoms possible using the nine point diagnostic criteria of BPD given that only 5 of the 9 criteria are required to make a formal diagnosis of BPD - resulting in 258 different presentations.

* The literature indicates a shift away from the orginal belief that BPD is an intractable PD resistant to intervention towards evidence that BPD responds well to evidence based, BPD specific treatment (thus BPD does not meet the criteria of a PD).

* BPD improves with age regardless of intervention - indicating perhaps development of life skills/self-psychological skills (thus BPD does not meet the criteria of a PD).

* BPD is linked with abusive family of origin or a history of trauma (i.e. not personality - not static) and is related to affect and attachment dysfunction which can be improved with intervention.

* There are cultural and gender biases which lead to women being more likely to be given the diagnosis of BPD with the same presentation (i.e. from case notes only).

I can't wait to hear from you and from anyone else, however, as I'm Australian and it's now 11:22pm over here I'll be logging off and going to bed so please don't be offended if I don't respond.

Cheers!
Amanda
ChicitaGatita   
Feb 18, 2009
Dissertations / Lit Review: How do I show I've critically analysed the studies I've read? [11]

Hi

I'm doing my Masters in Counselling Psychology and it's taking me FOREVER because my strength is in interpersonal communication and not academic writing.

I have had consistent feedback from various people that my lit review needs to demonstrate that I've critically analysed the literature. I've been told my lit review is too descriptive - in other words I've done a good job of summarising what the literature says but I haven't discussed the weaknesses and strengths of the studies I'm referring to.

I have no idea how to do this! And I need your help.

Theoretically I understand that I need to read each study to check to make sure that:
1. The research question and hypotheses are related to each other,
2. The lit review is relevant to the research question and reflects a gap that the study I'm reading is trying to fill
3. The methodology is appropriate given the research question
4. The results are discussed in relation to the limitation of the methodology and areas for further research are suggested.

But in practice I don't know how to:
1. Demonstrate I've done the above while keeping a narrative flow so that the critique of each study doesn't create a stop/start, stop/start awkwardness to the background of my thesis topic.

2. Determine which studies I need to do this for and which I don't. Surely I don't need to do a review of each and every study I've read that I want to refer to in my lit review - do I?

I can not wait to get feedback from those of you who love academic writing and doing lit reviews (do these people actually exist? I so hope so!).

If anyone can suggest a study for me to read that does this beautifully I would greatly appreciate it. In all my reading I seem to only find descriptive lit reviews like what I've been writing.

Thank you so much!
Amanda
Do You Need
Academic Writing
or Editing Help?
Fill out one of these forms:

Graduate Writing / Editing:
GraduateWriter form ◳

Best Essay Service:
CustomPapers form ◳

Excellence in Editing:
Rose Editing ◳

AI-Paper Rewriting:
Robot Rewrite ◳

Academic AI Writer:
Custom AI Writer ◳