jonathachou711
Dec 31, 2014
Undergraduate / We've all been there. We've all been trapped in the endless chain of Wikipedia articles [3]
"Wikipedia is neither a place nor an environment and is therefore not the correct response to this prompt. The essay requires you to present a place or environment that you frequent in order to clearly establish why you go there and where the sense of contentment comes from."
I disagree with this to an extent. I do believe that you can write about Wikipedia, or Facebook, or any website for that matter because websites, in essence, ARE environments. I do however, don't think it is the wisest choice. Take this with a grain of salt, but it's easy to interpret this essay as bs. If you truly do love spending time on Wikipedia and clicking random links, then props to you my friend, but it really is not that believable. You are correct in stating that success in the current world relies on narrow focus of learning. Actually, that's how it's been for millions of years. That is something called division of labor, my friend, and it is not a profound concept. I do not believe that colleges nor workplaces nor anyplace will find in the near future a person who has little depth in a breadth of knowledge more attractive than a person who is specialized one subject. In fact, the entire point of majors in college defeats the point of your essay.
At the end of your essay, you do mention that you like computer science, but this goes completely contrary to what you've talked about in your 2nd paragraph -- that you like everything. Choose one--either stick with liking everything or liking computer science. My advice is to go with the latter -- and restructure your essay to indicating why you like computer science.
But at the end of the day, Wikipedia as a place where you are "perfectly content" is just extremely unrealistic and unbelievable to a college counselor. It's the equivalent of writing "my only hobby is studying I promise". A passion for studying must come with a warrant/reason, which is usually exclusive to studying a single/few topics.
"Wikipedia is neither a place nor an environment and is therefore not the correct response to this prompt. The essay requires you to present a place or environment that you frequent in order to clearly establish why you go there and where the sense of contentment comes from."
I disagree with this to an extent. I do believe that you can write about Wikipedia, or Facebook, or any website for that matter because websites, in essence, ARE environments. I do however, don't think it is the wisest choice. Take this with a grain of salt, but it's easy to interpret this essay as bs. If you truly do love spending time on Wikipedia and clicking random links, then props to you my friend, but it really is not that believable. You are correct in stating that success in the current world relies on narrow focus of learning. Actually, that's how it's been for millions of years. That is something called division of labor, my friend, and it is not a profound concept. I do not believe that colleges nor workplaces nor anyplace will find in the near future a person who has little depth in a breadth of knowledge more attractive than a person who is specialized one subject. In fact, the entire point of majors in college defeats the point of your essay.
At the end of your essay, you do mention that you like computer science, but this goes completely contrary to what you've talked about in your 2nd paragraph -- that you like everything. Choose one--either stick with liking everything or liking computer science. My advice is to go with the latter -- and restructure your essay to indicating why you like computer science.
But at the end of the day, Wikipedia as a place where you are "perfectly content" is just extremely unrealistic and unbelievable to a college counselor. It's the equivalent of writing "my only hobby is studying I promise". A passion for studying must come with a warrant/reason, which is usually exclusive to studying a single/few topics.