Joe F
Dec 14, 2015
Graduate / 'reaching new heights in my career' - SOP For Masters in Engineering from Victoria University [4]
Hi dilwar1,
Your second draft is a significant improvement. There are still a few sentences and phrases that seem awkward to my American sensibilities but that might be down to cultural differences. I do have a some substantial comments though.
The program's admissions committee probably don't know what the Total Shutdown project is. You should eliminate this specific reference or elaborate more on it.
The reference to Maslow is out of place. His hierarchy of needs is fascinating and you might be right but what do a bunch of engineering professors know about Maslow?
". . . undertook various programs from international bodies such as OSHA USA, IOSH and NEBOSH UK, which provided the 'almost' competence but I still lack a lot of theories and methods, especially in fire safety." This is both vague and negative. For example, did you complete the OSHA 30-hour training or similar formal programs by IOSH or NEBOSH UK? "'Almost' competence" could be interpreted as incompetence. Perhaps try 'well-rounded basic competency" or something similar. Instead of saying what you lack, say these are areas in which you would like to strengthen your knowledge.
Saying that you "simply google'd" isn't saying much at all. Presumably the school does not like to think of itself as just another search result. The reference to "Larry and Sergey" is too familiar and in any case irrelevant. It's the same with "LinkedIn connections". Repeating historical facts and current statistics back to the admissions committee probably doesn't gain you much unless you relate it more strongly to your personal or professional goals. Rather than saying that it was an easy decision or that you could proceed without hesitation, talk about how you carefully considered the school's reputation for academic excellence, the specific aspects of the program that will make you a better engineer or something similar.
It's obvious that you have an excellent international background in safety engineering. That's a tremendous personal and professional achievement and the desire to further your education indicates a commitment to improving your professional credentials. These are all facets of your background that should come through much more clearly because they all work in your favor. Your SoP has many of the basic building blocks but it needs strengthening and elaboration. I hope my comments are helpful in that endeavor.
Best of luck and cheers!
Hi dilwar1,
Your second draft is a significant improvement. There are still a few sentences and phrases that seem awkward to my American sensibilities but that might be down to cultural differences. I do have a some substantial comments though.
The program's admissions committee probably don't know what the Total Shutdown project is. You should eliminate this specific reference or elaborate more on it.
The reference to Maslow is out of place. His hierarchy of needs is fascinating and you might be right but what do a bunch of engineering professors know about Maslow?
". . . undertook various programs from international bodies such as OSHA USA, IOSH and NEBOSH UK, which provided the 'almost' competence but I still lack a lot of theories and methods, especially in fire safety." This is both vague and negative. For example, did you complete the OSHA 30-hour training or similar formal programs by IOSH or NEBOSH UK? "'Almost' competence" could be interpreted as incompetence. Perhaps try 'well-rounded basic competency" or something similar. Instead of saying what you lack, say these are areas in which you would like to strengthen your knowledge.
Saying that you "simply google'd" isn't saying much at all. Presumably the school does not like to think of itself as just another search result. The reference to "Larry and Sergey" is too familiar and in any case irrelevant. It's the same with "LinkedIn connections". Repeating historical facts and current statistics back to the admissions committee probably doesn't gain you much unless you relate it more strongly to your personal or professional goals. Rather than saying that it was an easy decision or that you could proceed without hesitation, talk about how you carefully considered the school's reputation for academic excellence, the specific aspects of the program that will make you a better engineer or something similar.
It's obvious that you have an excellent international background in safety engineering. That's a tremendous personal and professional achievement and the desire to further your education indicates a commitment to improving your professional credentials. These are all facets of your background that should come through much more clearly because they all work in your favor. Your SoP has many of the basic building blocks but it needs strengthening and elaboration. I hope my comments are helpful in that endeavor.
Best of luck and cheers!