Writing Feedback / Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets to live, such as Mars. [2]

In the future, it seems it will be more difficult to live on the Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets to live, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

funds for space exploration

There are some individuals believe that mankind should invest more in seeking possibility of life outside the Earth due to difficulties of living on it in the future. In my opinion, I totally disagree with this view.

One reason is that searching life on other planets is waste of money. As we were know, some organizations like NASA annually spend millions of dollars to figure out living signals within our universe, but there is no sign of life announced so far. In addition, human being only exists in a suitable environment which has many necessary elements, such as water, atmosphere, temperature, etc. But this depends on distance among planets and the Sun. For instance, the temperature on Venus is very hot because it is the nearest star to the Sun.

The second reason is that recovering the Earth is the best solution to eliminate the difficulties. It will be more difficult to live on the Earth because it is being damaged by human's activities. Therefore we should spend more money implementing campaigns to improve our environment, such as cutting down on industrial emissions, planting trees, educating our next generation to protect the Earth, and so on. Moreover, if we can find other planets to live, but we continue destroying them by harmful activities, we are in the end no longer to exist.

In conclusion, although many people think that spending money to search other places outside the Earth is a way to tackle the difficulties of living in the future, I believe that protecting the Earth is the best solution.

Writing Feedback / Should adolescents be obligated to use their spare time for helping their residences without wages? [2]

compulsorily work for society?

Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community. They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole.

It is considered by many that adolescents should be obligated to use their spare time for helping their residences without wages. While those people agreeargue that this idea would bring many advantages to both the community and the individuals taking part either social community and individuals, I completely disagree with this viewpoint.

On the one hand, helping social community by that method is not effective. This is not an effective method to help communities. The first reason is that teenagers who are required to do unpaid jobs can feel unwilling, and they will reluctantly complete their tasks. As a result, their works might acquire a low efficiency will be sloppy and inefficient, or even being ruined detrimental. The second reason is that adolescents usually lack of skills and experience, social organizations, therefore, will waste of time guiding them before they are able to do anything.using to implement social tasks.

On the other hand, teenagers should use most of their time to enhance their knowledge as well as their skills for helping their relativesnext of kin. Firstly, teenagers are usually weak on many aspects of their lives such as communication, career orientation, etc. Thus, their spare time should be used to improve their abilities by reading books, doing some small surveys relating to them ., and thisThese things areis also a good way to relax after school. Secondly, doing housework not only helps their parents but also build up teenagers' skills to live independently after 18. For example, by preparing meals for their families, adolescents can cook meals themselves when they become adults.

In conclusion, although many people agree that adolescents should compulsorily work for society without payments, I do not support to this idea due to aforementioned reasons.