Fancy
Apr 27, 2020
Writing Feedback / whether company move to the rural is a good thing? [2]
It is cities, especially metropolis, ascribe the acute housing and land shortage and the worsening traffic conditions to the development of businesses. In my opinion,the government takes the action of transforming some enterprises to rural areas can bring more benefits, compared to any disadvantages it might bring.
The obvious argument is that moving the businesses from cities ,which permit high density land use,can provide more space to create well-being living conditions, and many people commute to rural areas, which efficiently alleviate the traffic congestion in rush hours. The companies tend to introduce the sophisticated technologies and afford fancy machines. With a view to stimulating employment and economic growth as the rural areas are poor and more young people work in cities, machines are necessary to substitute for those who have left the workforce to enable ageing workers to continue to do physical labour, which promote output rising.
There are , however, some disadvantages. The drain of professionals because of moving companies may well lead to loss of their benefit as well as decline the core competence. Some technical talents get used to their routine in city. It is obvious that there are more flourishing commercial districts, including offices, theaters and restaurants of cities than that of rural areas,while as far as I am concerned that the government can allocate the budget to infrastructure construction there. Providing more welfare is available for the staff.
In conclusion, it seems to me the businesses moving to rural areas are positive development.<b></b>
businesses moving to rural areas
It is cities, especially metropolis, ascribe the acute housing and land shortage and the worsening traffic conditions to the development of businesses. In my opinion,the government takes the action of transforming some enterprises to rural areas can bring more benefits, compared to any disadvantages it might bring.
The obvious argument is that moving the businesses from cities ,which permit high density land use,can provide more space to create well-being living conditions, and many people commute to rural areas, which efficiently alleviate the traffic congestion in rush hours. The companies tend to introduce the sophisticated technologies and afford fancy machines. With a view to stimulating employment and economic growth as the rural areas are poor and more young people work in cities, machines are necessary to substitute for those who have left the workforce to enable ageing workers to continue to do physical labour, which promote output rising.
There are , however, some disadvantages. The drain of professionals because of moving companies may well lead to loss of their benefit as well as decline the core competence. Some technical talents get used to their routine in city. It is obvious that there are more flourishing commercial districts, including offices, theaters and restaurants of cities than that of rural areas,while as far as I am concerned that the government can allocate the budget to infrastructure construction there. Providing more welfare is available for the staff.
In conclusion, it seems to me the businesses moving to rural areas are positive development.<b></b>
