Unanswered [5] | Urgent [0]
  

Posts by BucketOfFish
Joined: May 28, 2012
Last Post: May 28, 2012
Threads: 1
Posts: 1  
From: United States of America

Displayed posts: 2
sort: Oldest first   Latest first  | 
BucketOfFish   
May 28, 2012
Writing Feedback / GRE issue essay (Effects of technology, human interaction)? [2]

Some people believe that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction. Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another.

Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.

---------------------------------------------------

The rapidly shifting world of technologies has drastically changed the way in which people behave in society. Technologies developed in the past several decades has fundamentally altered the socialization patterns and behaviors of this generation, in both positive and detrimental ways. Developments such as texting, Skype, and Facebook have made available myriad new ways of communicating and interacting with one's friends. However, these technologies also make it more difficult to be exposed to new people and viewpoints, and gain socialization behaviors necessary for healthy interaction with society at large.This paradoxially hinders human interaction and isolates those who depend on such technology.

The ability to interact and keep in touch with one's friends at any time and place seems like a great boon at first, but over-reliance on this network stagates one's social skills, and prevents people from fully immersing themselves with new people and surroundings. Texting, in particular, is often used as a social crutch in uncomfortable situations. It's a common ocurrance in a crowded elevator full of strangers to see everyone with their phones out, attempting to avoid each other's gazes. Even at restaurants, it's not uncommon to see couples texting their respective friends rather than engaging in conversation with each other. Technologies such as texting provide a social safety net available anywhere, at any time. However, the downside of this is that people don't learn how to deal with new social situations, and voluntarily restrict their own social contact.

Besides being a hinderance to forging new social connections, technology can in a way replace human contact altogether. Deep and dedicated friendships with plenty of face-to-face contact is eschewed in favor of hundreds and hundreds of barely-recognizable Facebook "friends", online gaming buddies who have never met in real life, and forums and web communities which provide comfortable places where the unpleasantries of real-life interaction, clashing interests, and dissenting opinions don't have to be dealt with. It is far too easy to become lost in a virtual world, to the detriment of existing in the actual world. This sort of behavior exists all around the world, from stay-at-home all-night gamers in America to 30-something "otaku" hermits in Japan, to die-hard Internet cafe residents in China. The social problems caused by technology infatuation are so severe that several countries, including India, South Korea, and Russia, have passed laws attempting to curb such behavior.

Technology is a wonderful thing, and provides new and _ methods of human interaction. However,

----------------------------------------------------

That's as far as I got, but I think the summary should be pretty obvious. So, what's up with my essay? And for those who know a bit about the GRE, do you think leaving the summary hanging like that will affect my score?
BucketOfFish   
May 28, 2012
Writing Feedback / "The technology connecting people" - The gre issue 1 [2]

Hmm... well, there's a lot of grammatical errors in there, which I'll get into below. However, the structure is good, and it's excellent that you chose a nuanced position and was able to defend both sides. I think you should have combined paragraphs 2 and 3 into a single 'pro' paragraph, as they appear to provide similar evidence. In any case, the paragraphs should not be connected with the word 'yet', since they are alike in tone and argumentation, and you want to use 'yet' to signify a contract, or something different. I also think you should have added a bit more to your 'con' paragraph - some detail or an extra example would have helped to flesh out your essay.

Overall, your essay is quite short, and would have benefited from more examples. For example, you could talk about how engineers rely on computer simulations to help design heat exchangers and fluid conductors, and to analyze stresses in mechanical designs. You could mention how physicists need to model PDE's with large supercomputers in order to test and improve upon theories, and how such instrumentation is absolutely crucial for large particle collision projects such as the ones at CERN. On the other side, you could describe how technology has increased the availability of passive entertainment sources, such as television, video gaming, social networking, etc. and how such changes impact the patience and attention span necessary for complex thinking. You could also talk about issues such as internet or gaming addiction. However, you definitely need more examples.

Okay, now for the grammar. In your first sentence, you quote the slogan "The technology connecting people". However, this quote doesn't fit grammatically in the sentence. In a case like this, you need to shorten the quote and modify it with brackets, as such: The Nokia company said that "technology connect people". A bit after that, you have the sentence, "Some people think the thinking for themselves are actually controlled by the technology". There are a couple of things wrong with this sentence. First of all is subject-verb agreement. You use the plural verb "are" as an action for the singular noun "thinking". Instead, you should use the singular verb "is". Secondly, you use the word "the" too much. In English, you don't need to place "the" in front of a noun unless you are referring to a specific instance of that noun. In this sentence, instead of saying "the thinking" or "the technology", you can simply say "thinking" and "technology". When properly revised, the sentence should read: "Some people think that thinking for themselves is actually controlled by technology". While this sentence is now grammatically correct, it sounds incredibly awkward, and probably doesn't say what you want it to say. For one thing, technology does not "control" thinking. It may "influence", "diminish", or "impact" one's ability to think for oneself. Futhermore, the word "themselves" is misused here. As this sentence stands, it sounds like certain people are criticizing themselves for relying too much on technology, while the implication should be towards other people, or just people in general. The sentence would sound better if it said, "Some people believe that reliance on technology actually diminishes one's capability for independent thought", or, "Some people believe that critical thought is actually hampered by technology". I don't have time to critique the rest of your grammar, but the best way to pick up on grammar rules is to just read a lot and let the language sink in.
Need Writing or Editing Help?
Fill out one of these forms:

Graduate Writing / Editing:
GraduateWriter form ◳

Best Essay Service:
CustomPapers form ◳

Excellence in Editing:
Rose Editing ◳

AI-Paper Rewriting:
Robot Rewrite ◳

Academic AI Writer:
Custom AI Writer ◳