Writing Feedback / Ielts, Task2, Countryside or city, Discuss both sides + Opinion [4]

It is thought by some that it is better to live in a city while others believe that life is better in the countryside.
Discuss both the sides and give your opinion.

Although it is sometimes thought that it is better to dwell in metropolises, other people believe that living in rural areas is beneficial. In my opinion, I consider that living in an urban area is better owing to job opportunities and uber facilities.

On the one hand, living in the countryside is better because of the peaceful environment and lesser stress, according to some. In other words, people who live in rural areas have less stressful lives because their needs are a minimal and consequently lesser struggle in day to day lives. Being close to nature also provides a peaceful environment. Another reason why people tend to think that the countryside is better because it offers healthier air and organic food. The environment in the rural areas have lesser pollution owing to a lesser crowd and they can have the food grown in their own farms.

On the other hand, it is often believed that living in a city is better because it provides better job opportunities, basic facilities and I agree. All the multinational companies set up their offices in metro cities which ensure more employment and handsome perks for people working there. For example, all the Forbes top 100 companies have their offices in New York and obviously, this is the reason New York is one of the most populated cities in the world. Furthermore, it is quite evident that urban areas have better healthcare facilities, public transport, and infrastructure. As a result, more and more people prefer settling in urban areas, as it ensures an overall better life.

In conclusion, while people may vary in their opinion, I think that urban areas provide better life as a result of exciting job opportunities, better health care, and lifestyle.

Please review and provide your feedback, I am worried I have my exam on 18th-August, few days left to prepare :(

Writing Feedback / Ielts, Task2 - the critical environmental problems should be worked upon by all countries united [4]

solving Environmental problems

Environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.

It is often believed that environmental problems should be tackled by every country individually while others think these problems should be solved on a worldwide level. In my opinion, there are many environmental problems, and the resolution of the same to be done by some countries, or worldwide depends upon the type and criticality of environmental issue we are dealing with.

On the one hand, many believe that we live on same mother earth, sharing the same atmosphere, so efforts to resolve the issues should be ubiquitous. In other words, though there are some geographical difference but the air, water and land we use are part of same resource, Earth. Take Global Warming or dissertation, for example, these issues are universal and no country is unaffected by this. Therefore, there are some universal environmental problem, and these should be tackled unitedly.

On the other hand, there are some who think that environmental crisis should be tackled by countries rather than whole world. Every country is dealing with their own set of problems so there is no point in getting united to eradicate regional problems. For instance, The United States have been facing the massive wild fire every year from ages but there is no point in uniting against this problem as the problem is confined to only that area and there is nothing significant which any other country can help them with.

In my opinion, putting in united efforts or tackling the problem country wise totally depends upon the type of criticality of environment issue we are dealing with. If we are dealing with a regional problem, which is concentrated to a small region, then it ought to be dealt with in a country. Like the ozone layer hole in Antarctica needs to be taken care by them, as this happened for a small, concentrated region and this issue is not critical at this point in time. Nevertheless, there are global issues like Global Warming and soil erosion which needs to be tackled ubiquitously. Global Warming is very critical and its impact will be world-wide, sparing none, so this issue needs all hands working together in resonance.

In conclusion, though there are varying opinions about the resolution of environmental issues globally or country by country, I believe, the critical problems like Global warming should be worked upon by all countries united and petty regional environmental adversities should be taken care by every country individually.