Syedatanjin
Dec 30, 2023
Writing Feedback / Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty [2]
Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Although developed countries provide donations to underprivileged countries frequently these days, the donations don't work to eradicate their poverty practically. I completely agree with this, so I think underdeveloped countries should be provided other forms of aid.
Mainly, financial aid can solve short term problems of the countries that are underdeveloped, but this aid doesn't bring any changes to control poverty. When money is given to poor countries, most of them spend it on living costs. For example, in 2019 the US government donated about 12 billion to some developing nations, they only solved the problem for a few months. After that they become below the poverty line . For this reason, other forms of assistance should be preferred in this regard.
Moreover, wealthier governments can build health Care centers and educational institutions for the people of poor countries in order to develop their lifestyle. If they provide all of those facilities, then the poor people will be educated as well as healthy. Finally they will be able to be productive, they can control their poverty for forever. Thus a poor nation might benefit for the long term.
To sum up, I restate that the underprivileged part of our world should be helped with quality education and healthcare facilities. So wealthier countries should provide this type of aid rather than financial aid.
Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Although developed countries provide donations to underprivileged countries frequently these days, the donations don't work to eradicate their poverty practically. I completely agree with this, so I think underdeveloped countries should be provided other forms of aid.
Mainly, financial aid can solve short term problems of the countries that are underdeveloped, but this aid doesn't bring any changes to control poverty. When money is given to poor countries, most of them spend it on living costs. For example, in 2019 the US government donated about 12 billion to some developing nations, they only solved the problem for a few months. After that they become below the poverty line . For this reason, other forms of assistance should be preferred in this regard.
Moreover, wealthier governments can build health Care centers and educational institutions for the people of poor countries in order to develop their lifestyle. If they provide all of those facilities, then the poor people will be educated as well as healthy. Finally they will be able to be productive, they can control their poverty for forever. Thus a poor nation might benefit for the long term.
To sum up, I restate that the underprivileged part of our world should be helped with quality education and healthcare facilities. So wealthier countries should provide this type of aid rather than financial aid.
