Writing Feedback / Reading fiction is more enjoyable than watching movies? [2]

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Reading fiction (such as novels and short stories) is more enjoyable than watching movies.
Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position.

In the past,people prefer reading books in the free time,it's a kind of enjoyable entertainment,however,according to the progress in society,people are attracted by the high definition motion pictures,which quality is much better than ever.Nonetheless,I would prefer reading books.

Apparently,watching movie is an interesting diversion,which being shared with friends,it's the important factor of watching movies,additionally,such as those hazard and saga movies which bring us the visual stimulus.Vivid spectacle,clear picture,famed movie stars,these are the attractive factor to bring us into the world of movies.Did you find out the movies of "Harry Porter"is famed by the movies instead of it's novel.

How about reading books? is it really tedious of reading the whole book than watching movies? actually,I don't think so.I believe most of students are poor to write a coherent essay even a complete paragraph,that's why I suggest you to read the novel,in that,you will learn how the author put the words and words together naturally,how they imagine and describe something they have not even experienced.Reading books can also improve our reading skill and writing skill at the same time,besides,it's a good chance to know some rare words that we have never heard.

Last but not least,The obvious difference between watching movies and reading books is that we are being able to visualize and imagine the spectacle and ambience in the bookas by reading,throught reading,you may vicariously experience the story in the books such as you are actually there,this is the most attractive part of reading books.

I like watching movies as well,but I always believe that reading books will be more intesting than you have though if you truly enjoy it.

Writing Feedback / "teacher performs a vital role" - Computers should replace teachers in a classroom? [5]

In the age of high technology,computer role an unreplacement position with it's unique value,so much function as it has,bring computer up to be one of the most popular product,nonetheless,is it good enough to replace the role of teacher in a clssroom.

Indeed,computer is an intelligent crystallize of human research,it's feature rest with it's multifunction,the vital reason with it's popularity is internet connection which can be used to search to information and breaking news,besides the internet involves so many opinion from over the world that can provide the answer which doesn't exist in our course books,on the other hand,it might include the knowledge the teacher even never heard about,but it doesn't mean computer is qualified to take the place of teacher.

First of all,teacher can help students how to judge what is right or wrong,especially underage children which can be the most essential growing stage,teacher won't teach them merely in the books,but also help them to identify what they need to do,this is a work,in some sense,computers will never achieve,besides,students can not ask computer some particular question,for instance,computer can not tell you how to improve your study effeciency,because students all have completely different condition,only teacher can inform you what you going to do including any condition which can frustrate you.

Thus it can be seen,teacher performs a vital role to students,computer can not replace their duty in a classroom,at least not now!