Writing Feedback / A university plans to develop a new research center in your country. . [2]

A university plans to develop a new research center in your country.
Some people want a center for business research. Other people want a center
for research in agriculture (farming). Which of these two kinds of research
centers do you recommend for your country? Use specific reasons in your
recommendation.

I am not an economist . So I can not argue about this subject scientificaly.
So what I will say are only my personal opinions.I think that answer of this
question strongly depends on area that we are living in.I am living in iran
and I think that a center for agricultural research is better than a center
for bussiness research.I have my own reasons for this opinion that I will poit out
below :
Firstly , iran exports billions of barrels of oil to other countries each year. Gavernment earns
a lot of money from export of oil and gas and uses most fraction of them for military purposes
and daily consumption of people . Goverment is very big and people donot have enough money for
great bussineses because they can not compete with the government.Goverment opposes
with globalization .There are small stocks with limited exchanges and bussines dont exist in our
country in high level.So I think that developing a center for bussines affairs with this situation
is only the waste of money.

Seconly,Iran imports million tons of agricultural products evry year.A lot of people immigrate
to urban areas from rural areas every year . Tehran is capital of iran that have 12 million
people whereas iran has 60 million people. it makes tehran one of the polluted cities in the world.
tehran has also very traffic problems . I think that developing an agricultural center can help
for stopping immagration to urban areas . This can help to reduce consumtopns of the country
and equal supply and demand.
All in all ,I think that a center dor research in agriculture is necessary for iran and maybe
this is not a good plan for other countries.

Writing Feedback / history or mathematics? [3]

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

It is more important for students to study history and literature than it is for them to study science and mathematics. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.

I dont agree with this opinion. I think that each course has its own advantages for student.students usually learn different courses with diverse subjects in schools. They study history and literature besside mathematics and geometry superficially. But nowadays that science grows enormously, one person can not specialize in one or two aspect of science .So when students learned and studied diverse courses superficially they should select one of them and study more about that in university.I think this method has at least two advantages. firstly, when students study different courses in school they gratually understand what is their interest.So they can study more and specially about their interest in university. secondly,When one person spend his/her time on one aspect of science he/she can learn more about that and maybe he/she invent new things or methods in that field. Natural and mathematical siences are very important .Human has could produce electricity,build huge airplanes ,machines, etc with relying on this sciences.But this donot mean that literature and history are not important .history and literature are our heritage from our ancestor and if we donot understand the past very well we cannot have bright future.