Writing Feedback / Epilepsy versus Seizures [3]

As much as epilepsy and seizures differ, they have just as many comparisons. Remove this sentence completely - it is redundant.
At the same time, however, one can understand why another person-who wasn't well informed on the two subjects-might get the two mixed up.

Writing Feedback / SCIENTIFIC MYSTERIES; Vaccines and autism [7]

When I said simplify I meant you need to go through and take a look at your sentence structure. Some sentences should be a bit more concise. Though, I do not mean that you should create fragments. You should try to cut down on the amount of words you use.

Writing Feedback / SCIENTIFIC MYSTERIES; Vaccines and autism [7]

Not necessarily. Perhaps go over the sentences and fine tune them. I would look for ways to simplify some of your statements. Is this paragraph an introduction, a body paragraph, or a conclusion? I am assuming it is an introduction.

There is really only one other mistake I noticed when glancing over this paragraph. In the final sentence, "Children should receive vaccines because, there is no scientific evidence correlating autism to vaccinations, autism is a lifelong disease, and it protects herd immunity."

What are you referring to when you say "it"? Are you referring to autism or vaccines?

Writing Feedback / SCIENTIFIC MYSTERIES; Vaccines and autism [7]

I would edit the first sentence. Maybe put something along the lines of "Science cannot always answer a question..."
provided the "perfect storm" against
provided the perfect storm against

"The problem with this is that it inadvertently puts other children, along with infants too young to get vaccinated, at risk."
Explain what the problem is.