jaemi228
Jan 16, 2016
Writing Feedback / Should only staff who have worked in a company for a long time be promoted to a higher position? [3]
Some people think that only staff who have worked in a company for a long time should be promoted to a higher position. What's your opinion?
People have different views about whether long-term employees should be given promotion as a reward for their loyalty.My view is that this kind of encouragement should also be considered in other perspectives.
First, it is obvious that a more experienced worker will be easier to adapt to the working environment.This is because the experienced staff can understand the system more thoroughly.For example, he can tackle any issue related to the scope of his work and can implement good solutions to such problems. Undoubtedly, such employee deserves the promotion due to his broad knowledge and experience. Another important issue is the employee loyalty towards the company and that should be rewarded. Otherwise, he maybe disastisfied with the company's maltreatment and leave for others.
That is not to say that the experienced employee is the only one who deserves the promotion.In some companies, for example, the managers based the staff's quality on annual performance and development's reviews done by their supervisors.If those targets are met, then the staff can be promoted, even if they are relatively junior. The benefit of this approach is that it encourages staff to work harder and rewards merit and not just slow service.
In conslusion, there is no denying that long-term employees should be given prority in higher position.However, I believe that it is also wise to take account of the performance of more junior members of staff.
Some people think that only staff who have worked in a company for a long time should be promoted to a higher position. What's your opinion?
People have different views about whether long-term employees should be given promotion as a reward for their loyalty.My view is that this kind of encouragement should also be considered in other perspectives.
First, it is obvious that a more experienced worker will be easier to adapt to the working environment.This is because the experienced staff can understand the system more thoroughly.For example, he can tackle any issue related to the scope of his work and can implement good solutions to such problems. Undoubtedly, such employee deserves the promotion due to his broad knowledge and experience. Another important issue is the employee loyalty towards the company and that should be rewarded. Otherwise, he maybe disastisfied with the company's maltreatment and leave for others.
That is not to say that the experienced employee is the only one who deserves the promotion.In some companies, for example, the managers based the staff's quality on annual performance and development's reviews done by their supervisors.If those targets are met, then the staff can be promoted, even if they are relatively junior. The benefit of this approach is that it encourages staff to work harder and rewards merit and not just slow service.
In conslusion, there is no denying that long-term employees should be given prority in higher position.However, I believe that it is also wise to take account of the performance of more junior members of staff.
