Hellow everyone, this is my second essay of my practice for this month's SAT and I could really use your help here.Thanks a lot for you time!
Prompt:Should people let their feelings guid them when they make important decisions?
The dispute between the advantages and disadvantages of subjective and objective mind was posed long ago and is still far from over. Indeed, rational way of thinking in general enbles us to avert potential unwilling results but sometimes in specific circumstances or in an urgent time of life people's instinctive feelings in turn lead to coup.
To begin with, Galilei can be described as one of the founders of mechanics but when such aan erudite scientist made up his mind and decided to support the Helio-centric theory, I belived at that moment the yarning for truth, an inner feeling, replaces the 'rational' part in his mind. It is true that he was chastised drastically when he was alive but when he expired this 'impulsive' decision made him a hero of millions of people. So it is clear that when numerous scientisits forgo their youth, their bliss, and even their life, on the road acsertaining the truth for common wealfare and development of mankind, what demonstrates is not ration but emotion.
Meanwhile, the Nomandy-Landing, crux of World War II and sign of victory, was least to be called a sensible action when it was broached. As a matter of fact, the allies have a perfect landing area near by, which is much better than Nomandy on account of nearly all aspects, but the general Arthur chose Nomandy by his hunch. On that day, the other region was surrounded by strom but sun still shined in Nomandy, so as a result, half a million allies safely boarded from Nomandy and became a decisive force to end the war.
In most part of life it is greatly necessary and encouraged for people to do loads of work before they make decisions but in particular cases like the persuit of common welfare, sticking to the voice of their heart will sometimes achieve unpredictable accomplishment.
Prompt:Should people let their feelings guid them when they make important decisions?
The dispute between the advantages and disadvantages of subjective and objective mind was posed long ago and is still far from over. Indeed, rational way of thinking in general enbles us to avert potential unwilling results but sometimes in specific circumstances or in an urgent time of life people's instinctive feelings in turn lead to coup.
To begin with, Galilei can be described as one of the founders of mechanics but when such aan erudite scientist made up his mind and decided to support the Helio-centric theory, I belived at that moment the yarning for truth, an inner feeling, replaces the 'rational' part in his mind. It is true that he was chastised drastically when he was alive but when he expired this 'impulsive' decision made him a hero of millions of people. So it is clear that when numerous scientisits forgo their youth, their bliss, and even their life, on the road acsertaining the truth for common wealfare and development of mankind, what demonstrates is not ration but emotion.
Meanwhile, the Nomandy-Landing, crux of World War II and sign of victory, was least to be called a sensible action when it was broached. As a matter of fact, the allies have a perfect landing area near by, which is much better than Nomandy on account of nearly all aspects, but the general Arthur chose Nomandy by his hunch. On that day, the other region was surrounded by strom but sun still shined in Nomandy, so as a result, half a million allies safely boarded from Nomandy and became a decisive force to end the war.
In most part of life it is greatly necessary and encouraged for people to do loads of work before they make decisions but in particular cases like the persuit of common welfare, sticking to the voice of their heart will sometimes achieve unpredictable accomplishment.
