Unanswered [4] | Urgent [0]
  

Home / Book Reports   % width   Posts: 4


The Human Condition as Portrayed in The Merchant of Venice (Shakespeare's)



Pottergirl19 5 / 15  
Mar 1, 2012   #1
The subject was "Shakespeare's The Merchant of Venice speaks to the human condition. Analyze how Shakespeare, in writing The Mercahnt of Venice, succeeds in his didactic purpose for all of humanity. Any feedback you have at all would be much appreciated!!

The Human Condition as Portrayed in The Merchant of Venice

People are not purely good or purely bad: they are some combination of the two. No one is perfect, and no one is completely evil. Everyone does both right and wrong. All people are both greedy and generous, are able to love and to hate, and are full of revenge and mercy. In The Merchant of Venice, Shakespeare shows us the true human condition through his characters' actions. They are completely human. The "good" characters are not perfect, and the "bad" characters have feelings and reasons for their actions. They do not always do what is expected of them: people can be unpredictable, sometimes choosing to go against the rules and follow their own desires. Through the personas Shylock and Antonio, Jessica, and Portia, Shakespeare demonstrates the complex nature of the human condition, showing no person is completely who they at first seem to be.

In Shakespeare's day, Shylock was seen as the antagonist of the story. He was the hated Jew who tried to kill a beloved Christian merchant. Today, however, Shylock is often seen as the protagonist. Everyone hated him, but he just wanted to be understood and liked by others. He is sympathized with and seen as a broken down man, not an evil one. Both of these interpretations, while very different, are correct because of the complexity of Shylock's human nature. Shylock does indeed try to kill Antonio out of revenge. He will not take any amount of money, but wants Antonio's life. He is ruthless, showing no mercy. "My deeds upon my head! I crave the law, / The penalty and forfeit of my bond," (4.1.211-212). Critics of Shylock may say that he has no good in him. He is offered the money Antonio owes him, yet me will not take the money. Why? Because he is evil. If he has any good in him, he would take the money and go, not try to take Antonio's life, even if Antonio agreed to it. Antonio is a good man, and he should be spared. Any decent person would realize this. This, while true, is not the whole story. Shylock wants to kill Antonio because Antonio, while a good man, has been a horrible one to Shylock. Antonio mocks him, spits in his face, and calls him a dog. If Antonio had not been hateful to Shylock, Shylock would not want to kill him now. Antonio's doom is as much his own fault as Shylock's. There can be much sympathy for Shylock when the story is seen through his eyes.

"He hath disgraced me, and hind'red
me half a million; laughed at my losses, mocked at my
gains, scorned my nation, thwarted my bargains, cooled
my friends, heated mine enemies - and what's his reason?
I am a Jew." (3.1.48-52)
Shylock only wants Antonio to suffer as he has, for Antonio to realize what he has done to him. It may indeed by evil, but it is understandable. It is human. Shylock is the corruptive man he was interpreted as in Shakespeare's day, but also human, with real feelings and emotions, broken down by a life of misery.

When Jessica, Shylock's daughter, is introduced in the play, she is planning to run away and elope with a Christian. There are more sides to Jessica than there first seems to be. She appears to be running away from her oppressive father, the man she hates, to be with the man she loves. But at the same time, she knows it is wrong. Jessica realizes that it is a bad thing for her to hate her father, but she cannot not change the fact nevertheless. "Alack, what heinous sin is it in me / To be ashamed to be my father's child! / But though I am a daughter to his blood, / I am not to his manners" (2.4.16-19). Jessica is probably a good daughter to Shylock. He trusts her to lock up all his money and not go out to the masque with the Christians. There must be a basis for that trust, for Shylock does not trust people easily. But even though she is a good daughter and knows what she is doing is wrong, she cannot bring herself to stop. She is a good daughter doing something that will hurt her father. But this does not mean she is a bad person. Shylock has indeed been an overbearing father, not allowing Jessica to do many, if any, fun things. To Jessica, running away from her father is a sort of revenge for all those years of suffering, and a way of liberating herself. This still, however, is not an excuse for what she does to her father. If she is truly good, she would talk to Shylock about it before eloping, even though that probably would have meant not getting her way. Jessica is a complex person with conflicting emotions. She is a good person and in some ways a good daughter, but she follows her own feelings and runs away from her father, not thinking of what it would do to his. She is not perfect. She is simply human.

Portia is often seen as the perfect woman. She is intelligent, beautiful, loving, and polite. Her intelligence and cunning end up saving Antonio's life. She fulfills her father's dying wishes and chooses her husband through a lottery of caskets. But by no means was she perfect. In some ways she was hypocritical. She admits, "It is a good divine that follows his own / instructions. I can easier teach twenty what were good to / be done than be one of the twenty to follow mine own / teaching" (1.2.13-16). She knows how to be good but does not always do good. She is rude to the Moroccan Prince, at first only because of the color of his skin. In fact, she does not give any of her suitors, except Bassanio, the benefit of the doubt. If she really had been perfect, she would have at least given them time to prove themselves. Portia is also critical of her husband. She seems to trust him and love him completely, yet she tricks him into giving her his ring. Why would she do that? She does not fully trust him or his love for her. But her faults make her relatable. Shakespeare would not have written Portia to be the perfect woman, because no such woman exists. Everyone has faults. Portia is a little insecure about her marriage to her husband because she overheard him saying he would give her up to save Antonio. She has prejudices like everyone else, and she judges people by their first impressions, but that was the culture she grew up in. Portia is not perfect; she is simply human.

Shakespeare shows the complexity and faults of human nature through the actions of Shylock, Jessica, and Portia. Shylock tries to kill Antonio, a seemingly good person, but he does it because Antonio beat Shylock down again and again. Jessica runs away form her father and abuses his trust in her because she felt oppressed and was in love. Portia was was insecure about her marriage and prejudiced, but she had reasons to be. All of these characters have both good and bad qualities; both good and bad reactions to different situations. But the complexity of their natures is what makes them human.

jxiao13 1 / 2  
Mar 1, 2012   #2
Hi!
Good parallel structure in the beginning, but there is no need to repeat "are" every time, it just sounds clumsy.
"the true human condition through his characters' actions. They The characters are completely human. The "good" charactersones are not perfect, and the "bad" charactersones have feelings" just to get rid of the confusion with "they".

"do what is expected of them:which shows that people can be" to connect back to your idea that his characters are demonstrating human nature

"personas of? Shylock,and Antonio, Jessica, and Portia"
"Antonio owes him, yet me will not take the money"
"If he hashadany good in him, he "
"If Antonio had not been hateful to Shylock, Shylock would not want to kill him now." sounds awkward, especially because of the "now"

"Shylock iswasthe corruptivecorruptedman he was interpreted as in Shakespeare's day, buthe was also human"
"but she cannot not change the fact nevertheless" - maybe "but nevertheless, she cannot change that fact"
"not allowing Jessica to do many, if any, fun things" sounds awkward
"This still, however, is not an excuse" - "this however, is still not an excuse"
"If she is truly good, she would talk to Shylock about it before eloping" - change "it" to something more specific

"Why would she do that?It is because She does not fully trust "
"through the actions of Shylock, Jessica, and Portia. " - in the beginning, you list Antonio as well. Make sure your intro and conclusion match.

"But the complexity of their natures is what makes them human" - maybe put something about Shakespeare in your last sentence?

You have great ideas, you stick to your point, and you use quotes effectively. Just watch your verb tenses and your pronouns., and maybe try and come up with some transitions between the paragraphs? Good job!:)
GREASPIRANT 1 / 2  
Mar 1, 2012   #3
Can someone please review my essay?.

Introduction:-
"Education is the one which nurtures the passion of the human" - Swami Vivekanada. Education should guide someone in the road of his passion to reach the destination of success. Let me clarify the rights of the educational institutes on students in the next paragraph.

Body:-
Our issue says students should be dissuaded from the institutions if management of the institute finds him to be unsuccessful. My doubt in this issue is how can an institute says a person is unsuccessful in his education. Only stalk holder who can judge his result of his education is student not the institutes. There may be many reasons for a student not to be unsuccessful in his education. Reason for his/her lagging has to be found and corrected by institutes. Institutes should not dissuade him abruptly without realizing the students concern. Decision to dropping the students from the institutes has to be given to the students. Students may have the zeal passion to excel in his studies, but he may find difficult in understanding the concepts explained by the professors or teachers. So in this case if an institute dissuade the student without realizing the reason for his failure it will ruin the life of the students. Eventually this type of activities by the institutes will lead to demotivate the students from achieving his/her passion. Many students who come from rural areas find it difficult to handle the urban culture in colleges located in the cities, obliquely this may result in the poor performance by the students. If institutes decide the poor performance students as unsuccessful because of his/her cultural barrier, this will lead to scotching the rural students from persuading his/her passion.

Conclusion:-
I hope above discussion would definitely yield that educational institutes does have zero rights to dissuade the students from pursing the fields of study.
chalumeau /  
Mar 7, 2012   #4
Good rough rough draft. You clearly explain what happens in the story. However, I feel that it is not an essay. Let's try and strengthen your thesis statement.

You clearly point out that none of the characters always choose the most direct path to achieve their goals. Sometimes the path chosen is self-destructive in the case of Shylock.

"Through the personae of Shylock and Antonio, Jessica and Portia, Shakespeare demonstrates the complex nature of the human condition: no person is eternally constant."

The question asks you to decipher how Shakespeare teaches the human condition to us--his pupils. Which character especially do you think embodies the teacher archetype (or persona)? You have to make a choice here. I suppose you could pick out certain quotes from a couple of characters and say it's all of them, but you still have to say why. What makes them the teacher? Are there different kinds of teachers? Methods of teaching? Why?

Do you see how I'm analyzing the situations and characters--not simply replaying what happened in the play?

"Shakespeare demonstrates the inconstancy of human nature through hyperbolic displays of constancy."

Try and see if you can come up with something better.

What a fantastic play! I didn't read it until I was in my 30s, and I'm sorry I waited so long.


Home / Book Reports / The Human Condition as Portrayed in The Merchant of Venice (Shakespeare's)
Need Writing or Editing Help?
Fill out one of these forms:

Graduate Writing / Editing:
GraduateWriter form ◳

Best Essay Service:
CustomPapers form ◳

Excellence in Editing:
Rose Editing ◳

AI-Paper Rewriting:
Robot Rewrite ◳

Academic AI Writer:
Custom AI Writer ◳