Unanswered [5] | Urgent [0]
  

Posts by Benn_Myers
Joined: Nov 14, 2010
Last Post: Dec 27, 2010
Threads: 8
Posts: 45  
From: United States of America

Displayed posts: 53 / page 2 of 2
sort: Latest first   Oldest first  | 
Benn_Myers   
Nov 17, 2010
Writing Feedback / Government should sponsor to build up museum and theatre . [4]

"To start with, government's sponsoring to build up museum and theatre will encourage cultural growth in the society, which is a priority for government. As we all know, a nation can be rich in every material sense, but, if it fails to provide for and nurture creative expression, it is impoverished in immeasurable ways." This is the sort of thing you want to avoid in an essay, you have a point, but you don't prove it in any way, there's no evidence. You can't just say that a culture that fails ti nurture creative expression is impoverished in countless ways, to make this effective you need to show us WHY that hurts a country so bad and why its worth investing in.

"Furthermore, building museum and theatre helps ensure that people have access to artistic experiences. In addition, the establishment of museum and theatre will improve arts presentations or exhibitions so that people can enjoy vibrant arts and culture. It also increases access for people to performing arts, visual arts, media arts, museum collections, and heritage displays. In conclusion, investing money to build up museum and theatre will lift public cultural level and enrich public life." You need to define a public "cultural level," its a phrase which is far too nebulous to be effectively used in an argument. I would lay down a concrete definition early on and then expand on it from there, additionally, I would consolidate this into your first body paragraph since they are similar and both pretty short.

"Ultimately, there is a positive economic impact of investment in theses creative industries, since museum and theatre's construction definitely will create jobs and growth in the industry. On one hand, it can provide sustainable and rewarding employment. On the other hand, museum and theatre, as regional projects, will provide an economic benefit to those regions, because heritage tourism is a major foreign exchange earner world wide. Thus, museum and theatre's construction will contribute a great deal to economic growth and prosperity." First off you don't want to use "on one hand" and "on the other" here, it implies a contrast whereas in reality you are making two positive points which are in the same vein. This may be your stronger paragraph because you supply some actual evidence, "heritage tourism is a major foreign exchange earner world-wide." However, it would behoove you to expand on this example and preferably use some actual figures.

My last complaint is that your essay doesn't follow the progression you put forward in your intro. You say you're going to talk about why: "the government should invest money to build up museum and theatre to develop the nation's arts and culture, create jobs and growth in the industry, and enhance people's access to a diverse range of cultural choices." But you instead talk about: "Building up the nations arts and culture, building up on the nations arts and culture ( you need to make a clearer distinction between these two points in your essay), and the material benefits. You need to follow your own order and point set forward in the intro, its the reader guide and it will read in a lot easier and more organized manner if they know whats coming.
Benn_Myers   
Nov 17, 2010
Undergraduate / "My idolization of Batman" - Fictional characters that influenced you Common App [6]

This is my essay for the common application is response to prompt #4: Talk about a fictional characters influence on you.
I'm looking for how I can improve in any way, in particular I'm concerned about my conclusion, which I'm afraid might seem too cliche. Any help is appreciated.

My initial idolization of Batman was derived from the purest of motivations: admiration of Karate skills. Its true, in my youth the reason I found Batman so enthralling was his incredible skill at unarmed combat and his raw ability to be physically heroic. Somewhere in my young mind I registered that I admired his courage and persistence too, but these were secondary in my mind and I was much too busy zooming around the living room clumsily karate chopping furniture to lend it too much thought.

However, contrary to all natural and expected tendencies my admiration for Batman has only increased with age and maturity. Thankfully though, my reasons for this admiration have evolved beyond Batman's martial skill.

Batman is, in my mind, a personification of restraint and principle. Throughout his 50 year run as a character he has never killed one of his enemies. We see him struggle with the decision to kill his defeated foes issue after issue, always considering the fact that killing the Joker might save hundreds of lives. We see him shake with rage and scream his desire to end his most hated antagonist's life, but we never see him act on it.

And many people consider this far from a good thing. I remember watching Batman cartoons with my brother and his friends and having them constantly (and bizarrely frantically) question and mock Batman's decision to leave the Joker alive. They chalked it up to stupidity and blind stubbornness, and may people still attribute it to that.

But possible ramifications aside there's no denying that the idea of absolute principles - the idea we draw lines for ourselves which we will never cross- has had a profound effect on me. Batman is human, he struggles with emotions and compulsions and pressures just like anyone, and his ability to control and check these powers is what makes him a hero, not his karate or training.

Because despite what I've learned in 4th grade assemblies and scattered presentations from volunteer groups and teachers, virtue isn't about compassion, charity, or bravery, it's about restraint. Virtue is the ability to take the impulses we feel that push us to hurt, or run, or to lose control and deny them. It's the ability to say "no" to the darkness that lives and crawls and bubbles forth from inside of us; to master ourselves and rid ourselves of doubt, fear and hate. Nobility demonstrated without this basic capacity is hollow. Acting without fear is brashness, not courage. Living without anger isn't peace, its apathy. And temperance without greed is indifference.

This restraint and principle is always with me. I try to stick to my principles, I do not break the rules of behavior I have set for myself and I do not intend to. As odd as it sounds, in this way Batman's always with me. I feel his shadowy image in my mind every time I reject drugs, or every time I overcome the momentary desire to simply walk into a movie instead of paying. He's there to help me resist sudden moments of curiosity and weakness, to help me push away my greed or lust, and to help me relax in moments of sudden anger or offense. He's my rodent-garbed guardian, and I couldn't ask to be in better hands.

Some people tell me I'm crazy trying to live up to a standard of behavior in the vein of a fictional super-hero. The phrase that is always inevitably thrown out is, "you're only human." I hate this; it's the idea that humans are bound to their flaws and follies, that they are inescapable. It may be almost impossible to live a life free of mistakes, but is it wrong to try? There is no real reason why human beings capacity for good is any less than their infinite capacity for evil. We are creatures of complete duality, angels and demons, saints and sinners, super-heroes and villains. And our alignment is a choice which requires only firm commitment and belief.

And so I strive and do my best to live to his example, to try to live a life free of mistakes and moral regrets. This is made possible with the most powerful of tools: human commitment born not from a mandate or desire to impress, but from an intrinsic and deep sense of who I am, who I want to be, and perhaps most importantly, who I may become if I'm not careful.

I believe in integrity, I believe in my ability to do good, I believe in humanities strength and our ability to rise above our worst enemy, ourselves, and become something more.

And, most of all, I believe in Batman.
Benn_Myers   
Nov 15, 2010
Undergraduate / Doubt and Consequence: Common Application Essay - Another prompt of your choosing [7]

Thank you very much! It means a lot.

As for your criticism I definitely see where your coming from. That's the feedback I got from my teacher when I showed it to them too. However, I'm having a problem deciding what exactly to cut, no one seems to be able to definitely high-light which metaphors are weakest or contribute the most to the sense of repetition, and this leaves me kind of paralyzed because I'm afraid of cutting away something good or leaving something awful.

Any sort of direct feedback you could give me about what to cut would be very much appreciated.

Thank you again.
Benn_Myers   
Nov 15, 2010
Undergraduate / "My ravioli dilemma" - UC prompt, personal contribution, quality [8]

I agree with genevieveedu. This is an essay that needs a rewrite. The idea isn't bad, and the example could certainly be used in a essay. But the flippant tone and rather abrupt asides ruin the flow of the essay. This needs a rewrite for it to be usable.
Benn_Myers   
Nov 15, 2010
Undergraduate / "America's grip on my shoulders" - my indoctrination of American culture, patriotism [9]

I am not intimately familiar with Georgetown's application process, but didn't you say the prompt has to do with your descent and re-acceptance of patriotism? I think that they'll understand your essay and what its about with a lighter introduction. The metaphor isn't bad, its just a little overwrought for my tastes and I would consider trimming it down a little bit.
Benn_Myers   
Nov 15, 2010
Undergraduate / "the definition of a workaholic" - Yale Supplemental Essay Advice [7]

Your intro quote doesn't really fit with the rest of your essay. There is a tenuous sort of connection but the quote and the essay (especially if you've read Thoreau, which the admissions officer will have) don't really mesh together very well.

I also don't really like your discussion of American culture, its not needed and its irrelevant in defining yourself. It's only function is to allow you to define workaholic, which is a word which you need not define.

Also, I would cut the part about not being able to keep up with your friends, or at least tone down that part of the passage. Yale is looking for hard-working, social, and well-rounded people, you don't want to make yourself seem like someone who is only able to work, and can't even maintain social ties due to your commitment.

Finally, your conclusion feels like a formulaic essay conclusion. Starting it with the "overall" makes me feel like you're writing because you have too, not because you have any sort of passion for what you're talking about.

You're style, conventions, and general idea are fine, but I'd give this bad-boy a rewrite. Just sit down and write and don't worry about it and see what comes out, you might have better luck cleaning this up by writing a second answer on the same topic (I find it always helps with essays.)

I'll read it again if you choose to rewrite or edit this one.
Best of luck!
Benn_Myers   
Nov 14, 2010
Undergraduate / "ephemeral" - Favorite word essay -UVA 250 words [8]

This essay is good, but extremely negative. I wouldn't use it for an application since admissions officers tend to look for positive essays, and while your essay ends on a more positive note, it is still pretty negative overall.

Not sure about the letter format, its certainly intriguing and could work very well to set you apart. I'd consult a school counselor or someone who is familiar with such things.
Benn_Myers   
Nov 14, 2010
Undergraduate / "America's grip on my shoulders" - my indoctrination of American culture, patriotism [9]

I like the metaphor that begins your essay, but I think it goes on long enough that it becomes a bit overwrought. I would try to show patriotism without falling into this sort of overly-dramatic personification of our country.

I really like your middle portion, starting with, "I was born in 1993" and ending with, "Democracy and Capitalism." Its light, clear, and humorous.

"Intelligence is the successor of ignorance. Before intelligence, we were all ignorant. In my years preceding high school, I would vouch I was thoroughly ignorant and thusly not aware of my ignorance, (the ironic paradox of ignorance.) This vindication can be supported through my acquaintance with one word: communism" This section of your essay is overly intellectual and has very little bearing on the prompt. I wouldn't analyze the nature of ignorance in this essay, you'd be better off just stating that you were ignorant and moving onto your main point.

But overall you're definitely on the right track. Keep writing and post the full thing here when you're done and I'll read it again.

Hope this helps!
Benn_Myers   
Nov 14, 2010
Undergraduate / How baking spurred my interest in prosocial emotions [4]

Well first off I have to say I really like the idea for your essay. Linking baking to Psychology is original and the link is quite well-explained and clear in your essay, so, the most important piece of your essay, content is solid.

As for your introduction I feel that you have a good opportunity for some form of comedy or feel-good writing there. Spending another sentence expanding on your childish forays in the kitchen might bring a smile to a readers face and pull them into the essay easier.

My primary criticism of this essay revolves around your fifth and sixth paragraphs. I'm not an admissions experts but I feel like you citing works you've read and discussing their impact lacks force. They want to know more about you, and while these works demonstrate your knowledge and scratch the surface in exposing your interest in the field, it feels very impersonal. I would rework or remove this part of your essay, focusing and delving deeper into what exactly it is about Psychology that's so interesting to you and what you hope to do with it. (And yes, I know you did this earlier but I feel like you could go a whole lot deeper.)

Overall it's a solid essay, and with a bit of work it'll be as great as the idea. Hope this helps, best of luck.
Benn_Myers   
Nov 14, 2010
Undergraduate / Doubt and Consequence: Common Application Essay - Another prompt of your choosing [7]

This is the essay I'm considering using for my Common Application submission under the prompt #6: Another prompt of your choosing. I'm sure I have a few grammar errors in there and feedback on that front is always very appreciated. I'd also like feedback on what to cut out, (I feel it needs to be shorter) and general critiques of the quality.

Thank you!

There is nothing in this world as internally exhausting as doubt of oneself.
Doubt can grow it worms its way much deeper inside us; it often grows to characterize our actions as every gesture and thought becomes poisoned by the monster living in our heart.

My experience with doubt cannot be easily grouped into one story or memory, for I've skirmished with it many times over the years, each of us taking to our trenches and trading shots until, inevitably, I drive him away from the mental battleground for a few weeks. But he returns. Usually in the wake of an essay I didn't do well on or an inability to put words down on a page at home. These are small occurrences, and the practical and reasonable part of me calls out, saying that I shouldn't despair, but the deeper emotional part is plagued by the horrible: doubt.

...

Need Writing or Editing Help?
Fill out one of these forms:

Graduate Writing / Editing:
GraduateWriter form ◳

Best Essay Service:
CustomPapers form ◳

Excellence in Editing:
Rose Editing ◳

AI-Paper Rewriting:
Robot Rewrite ◳

Academic AI Writer:
Custom AI Writer ◳